That makes no sense at all, it would make it slow as shit.
I am tired of repeating this:
Don't use BINARY docvalues
Don't use BINARY docvalues
Don't use BINARY docvalues
Use types like SORTED/SORTED_SET which will compress the term
dictionary and make use of ordinals in your application instead.
On 9-8-2015 16:22, Toke Eskildsen wrote:
Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
I am tired of repeating this:
Don't use BINARY docvalues
Don't use BINARY docvalues
Don't use BINARY docvalues
Use types like SORTED/SORTED_SET which will compress the term
dictionary and make use of ordinals in
On 08/09/2015 06:29 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi,
My values are unique and equal to the number of documents, They have
varying sizes, say at least 10 bytes and may be a lot bigger (say 4kbytes)
I don't share, index or sort them.
I don't do grouping/faceting either
I only want to store,
Hi,
My values are unique and equal to the number of documents, They have
varying sizes, say at least 10 bytes and may be a lot bigger (say 4kbytes)
I don't share, index or sort them.
I don't do grouping/faceting either
I only want to store, retrieve and traverse those values
Then use
Arjen van der Meijden acmmail...@tweakers.net wrote:
On 9-8-2015 16:22, Toke Eskildsen wrote:
Maybe you could update the JavaDoc for that field to warn against using it?
It (probably) depends on the contents of the values.
That was my impression too, but we both seem to be second-guessing
On 08/09/2015 04:55 PM, Arjen van der Meijden wrote:
On 9-8-2015 16:22, Toke Eskildsen wrote:
Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
I am tired of repeating this:
Don't use BINARY docvalues
Don't use BINARY docvalues
Don't use BINARY docvalues
Use types like SORTED/SORTED_SET which will compress
Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
I am tired of repeating this:
Don't use BINARY docvalues
Don't use BINARY docvalues
Don't use BINARY docvalues
Use types like SORTED/SORTED_SET which will compress the term
dictionary and make use of ordinals in your application instead.
This seems
Greetings
are there any plans to implement compression of the variable length
bites[] binary doc Values,
say in blocks of 16k like for stored values ?
my .cfs file goes from 2MB to like 400k when I zip it
Best regards,
Olivier
On 08/08/2015 02:32 PM, jamie wrote:
Greetings
Our app
