Thanks Mike. Yeah, I guess it wouldn't work for us in that case.
Marcos
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:00 AM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Marcos Juarez Lopez
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your quick response Mike. I'll be sure to pay mor
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Marcos Juarez Lopez wrote:
> Thanks for your quick response Mike. I'll be sure to pay more attention to
> amount vs quantity in the future :)
Sorry for being pedantic! I've been reading the book "Bugs in
Writing" recently :)
> Just one clarification. I didn'
Thanks for your quick response Mike. I'll be sure to pay more attention to
amount vs quantity in the future :)
Just one clarification. I didn't mention we actually are using phrase and
proximity queries, which I believe use the position information. If that's
the case, is there a way to specify
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Marcos Juarez Lopez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to optimize an index we have, and one thing that has come up
> recently is that we're not really using term frequencies, and we don't need
> any scoring. We noticed that the term frequencies (.doc files) are a
> sign
Hi,
I'm trying to optimize an index we have, and one thing that has come up
recently is that we're not really using term frequencies, and we don't need
any scoring. We noticed that the term frequencies (.doc files) are a
significant chunk of the total index size, and we'd like to reduce those,
or
