Hi Uwe, Shai and Ian
Thanks for your help with this - I played around with your suggestions
and have got it to work perfectly. The problem was that the
CachingWrapperFilter was not passing the acceptDocs through to my custom
Filter, so I simply removed it.
Best regards
- Chris
On 16.03.20
Hi Uwe,
I guess you're probably a fed up with me and I apologise for the
hassle.
I realise I have asked a lot of questions in the last few days.
If you get a little time could you please have a think about this
problem as I am currently unable to move forward with it - I have tried
all the s
Hi Uwe
I was just composing an email to you, so here it is!
You just have to implement the "protected boolean matchDoc(int
docId)" method. You should return this DocIdSet from your filter
instead of the manual code you created.
Yes, I tried that, see below ...
Sorry about earlier, I did mana
bammers.net
> Subject: RE: Filtering question
>
> Hi Uwe
>
> I have downloaded Lucene 5.0.0 source to look at the Filters you mention.
> DocValuesTermsFilter looks promising, however I cannot find
> FieldCacheDocIdSet anywhere in Lucene 4.10.2 or in 5.0.0. Where should I be
Hi Uwe
I have downloaded Lucene 5.0.0 source to look at the Filters you
mention. DocValuesTermsFilter looks promising, however I cannot find
FieldCacheDocIdSet anywhere in Lucene 4.10.2 or in 5.0.0. Where should
I be looking?
I take your point about brute-forcing the DocValues search and a
Hi Chris,
> Hi Uwe, thanks for your suggestions. I have tried a couple of things with no
> luck yet:
>
> > Sorry,
> > I just noticed, you are using TermFilter not TermsFilter: This one
> > does not support random access (using bits()). Because of this the
> > filtered docs cannot be passed down
Hi Uwe, thanks for your suggestions. I have tried a couple of things
with no luck yet:
Sorry,
I just noticed, you are using TermFilter not TermsFilter: This one
does not support random access (using bits()). Because of this the
filtered docs cannot be passed down using acceptDocs.
TermsFilter
; http://www.thetaphi.de
> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 8:07 PM
> >> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> >> Subject
...@thetaphi.de
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 8:07 PM
>> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: Filtering question
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> BooleanQuery:
>
che.org
> Subject: RE: Filtering question
>
> Hi,
>
> BooleanQuery:
> -- Clause 1: TermQuery
> -- Clause 2: FilteredQuery
> - Branch 1: MatchAllDocsQuery()
> - Branch 2: MyNDVFilter
>
>
> Why does it look like this? Clause 2 should simply b
-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Bamford [mailto:ch...@chrisbamford.plus.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 6:39 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Filtering question
>
> Additio
Additional -
I'm on lucene 4.10.2
If I use a BooleanFilter as per Ian's suggestion I still get a null acceptDocs
being passed to my NDV filter.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 11 Mar 2015, at 17:19, Chris Bamford wrote:
>
> Hi Shai
>
> I thought that might be what acceptDocs was for, but in my cas
Hi Shai
I thought that might be what acceptDocs was for, but in my case it is null and
throws a NPE if I try your suggestion.
What am I doing wrong? I'd like to really understand this stuff ..
Thanks
Chris
> On 11 Mar 2015, at 13:05, Shai Erera wrote:
>
> I don't see that you use acceptDo
I don't see that you use acceptDocs in your MyNDVFilter. I think it would
return false for all userB docs, but you should confirm that.
Anyway, because you use an NDV field, you can't automatically skip
unrelated documents, but rather your code would look something like:
for (int i = 0; i < reade
Can you use a BooleanFilter (or ChainedFilter in 4.x) alongside your
BooleanQuery? Seems more logical and I suspect would solve the problem.
Caching filters can be good too, depending on how often your data changes.
See CachingWrapperFilter.
--
Ian.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Chris Bamf
Hi,
I have an index of 30 docs, 20 of which have an owner field of "UserA" and 10
of "UserB".
I also have a query which consists of:
BooleanQuery:
-- Clause 1: TermQuery
-- Clause 2: FilteredQuery
- Branch 1: MatchAllDocsQuery()
- Branch 2: MyNDVFilter
I execute my search as follows:
s
Hi
Sorry for not getting back to you. Been swamped with stuff and work and
home. Just managed to check my lucene emails!
You are right i made some silly mistakes with the testcase and have updated
accordingly. The test is still failing but the properties are set
correctly:
public class Underwr
FWWI: a test case with multiple asserts is more useful if you clarify
where it failes ... ie: show us the failure message, or put a comment on
athe line of the assert that fails.
i didn't run your testcase, but skimming it a few things jumpt out at me
that might explain whatever problem you ar
Hi
Thanks for your reponse. Here is the following testcase:
public class UnderwriterReferenceTest {
private Directory directory;
private Analyzer analyzer;
private IndexSearcher indexSearcher;
private IndexWriter indexWriter;
private Document layerDocumentA;
@Before
: Hi
: I include a testcase to show what I am trying to do. Testcase number 3
: fails.
the mailing list is finicky about attachments ... the best thing to do is
to include your test case directly in the body of your email as plain
text.
: > I created a test case to test this solution and it wo
Hi,
Apologies for resending this email but just wondering if I could get some
input on the below. I am in the final stages of getting a proof of concept
together and this is the final piece of the puzzle.
Sorry again for sending this!
Cheers
Amin
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Amin Mohammed-
Hi
I include a testcase to show what I am trying to do. Testcase number 3
fails.
Thanks
Amin
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking at applying a security filter for our lucene document and I
> was wondering if I could get feedback on whether the so
Hi,
I am looking at applying a security filter for our lucene document and I was
wondering if I could get feedback on whether the solution I have come up
with. Firstly I will explain the scenario and followed by the proposed
solution:
We have a concept of a Layer which is a project whereby a br
23 matches
Mail list logo
