da.1...@gmail.com
To: baris.ka...@oracle.com
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2019 9:14:22 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: FuzzyQuery- why is it ignored?
If You could index these entries and still find Main from MAINS query with
Lucene 8.1,
that means this is a bug in Lucene 6.6.
No, it doe
my env.
baris
- Original Message -
From: tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2019 10:35:26 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: FuzzyQuery- why is it ignored?
Please send messages to java-user mail list only. It is not
recommended
gt; baris
>
> - Original Message -
> From: tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com
> To: baris.ka...@oracle.com
> Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2019 9:14:22 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: FuzzyQuery- why is it ignored?
>
> > If You could index these entries and stil
s a bug in Lucene 6.6.
Best regards
- Original Message -
From: baris.ka...@oracle.com
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org, tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com,
erickerick...@gmail.com, a...@linux.com, baris.ka...@oracle.com,
luc...@mikemccandless.com
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2019 10:49:05 AM GMT -05:00 US/C
is.ka...@oracle.com,
luc...@mikemccandless.com
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2019 10:48:47 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: FuzzyQuery- why is it ignored?
i see, i am using an older version 6.6 and we should switch to Your 8.1
version of at least 7.X.
Tomoko i think i understood You meant
16, 2019 4:39:29 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: FuzzyQuery- why is it ignored?
Hi,
you said you are using standard analyzer. If so, you are not using any
stemmer at all (please see the analyzer's Javadocs).
2019年6月16日(日) 11:43 Baris Kazar :
>
> Hello,-
> Erick ex
ck...@gmail.com, a...@linux.com, baris.ka...@oracle.com,
> luc...@mikemccandless.com
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2019 10:48:47 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: FuzzyQuery- why is it ignored?
>
> i see, i am using an older version 6.6 and we should switch to Your 8.1
&g
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org, tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com,
erickerick...@gmail.com, a...@linux.com, baris.ka...@oracle.com,
luc...@mikemccandless.com
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2019 10:48:47 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: FuzzyQuery- why is it ignored?
i see, i am using an older
i see, i am using an older version 6.6 and we should switch to Your 8.1
version of at least 7.X.
Tomoko i think i understood You meant MAIN NASHUA for the string :)
Again i really appreciate all answers.
How do we disable or enable stemming while indexing? :) another question.
Best regar
Sorry, I made a mistake when copypasting. Let me just correct my previous mail.
> 1. Indexed this text: "NASHUA NASHUA HILLSBOROUGH NEW HAMPSHIRE UNITED
> STATES".
1. Indexed this text: "MAIN DUNSTABLE NASHUA HILLSBOROUGH NEW
HAMPSHIRE UNITED STATES"
As far as I can say, this query correct
However, the index does not have MAINS but MAIN for the expected entry.
Best regards
On 6/13/19 10:33 AM, baris.ka...@oracle.com wrote:
does it consider it as like plural word? :) :) :)
That makes sense.
Best regards
On 6/13/19 10:31 AM, baris.ka...@oracle.com wrote:
Erick,
Cool, could Y
does it consider it as like plural word? :) :) :)
That makes sense.
Best regards
On 6/13/19 10:31 AM, baris.ka...@oracle.com wrote:
Erick,
Cool, could You give a simple example with my example please?
Best regards
On 6/13/19 10:12 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
Shot in the dark: stemming. When
Erick,
Cool, could You give a simple example with my example please?
Best regards
On 6/13/19 10:12 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
Shot in the dark: stemming. Whenever I see a problem with something ending in
“s” (or “er” or “ing” or….) my first suspect is that stemming is turned on. In
that cas
Shot in the dark: stemming. Whenever I see a problem with something ending in
“s” (or “er” or “ing” or….) my first suspect is that stemming is turned on. In
that case the token in the index that’s actually searched on is somewhat
different than you expect.
The test is easy, just insure your fie
Tomoko,-
That is strange indeed.
Something is wrong when i use mains but maink, mainl, mainr,mainq, maint
all work ok any consonant at the end except s works in this case.
Case #3 had +contentDFLT:mains~2 but not +contentDFLT:"mains~2".
i am using fuzzy query with ~ from Query.builder and t
Hi,
> Ok, i think only this very specific only "mains" has an issue.
It looks strange to me. I did some test locally.
1. Indexed this text: "NASHUA NASHUA HILLSBOROUGH NEW HAMPSHIRE UNITED STATES".
2a. This query string (just copied from your Case #3) worked correctly
for me as far as I can see
Ok, i think only this very specific only "mains" has an issue.
all i knew about Lucene was fine :) Great...
i have one more question:
which one is advised to use: FuzzyQuery or the Query.parser with search
string~ appended?
The second one will go through analyzer and make search string lower
Hi again,-
this is really interesting and i hope i am missing something. Index
small cases all entries so case sensitivity is not an issue i think.
Case #1:
org.apache.lucene.queryparser.classic.QueryParser parser = new
org.apache.lucene.queryparser.classic.QueryParser(field, phraseAnalyzer)
18 matches
Mail list logo
