indexing.
I would be happy to be directed to another way to get 2+ GB files indexed.
> highlighting requires
> the document in its uninverted form. Otherwise what text would you
> highlight?
Highlighting the, possibly changed, terms from the index is my goal
if I can't store the entir
uninverted form. Otherwise what text would you
highlight?
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 3:46 PM Shifflett, David [USA]
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I am converting my application from
> reading documents into memory, then indexing the documents
> to streaming the documents to be indexed.
&g
Hi,
I am converting my application from
reading documents into memory, then indexing the documents
to streaming the documents to be indexed.
I quickly found out this required that the field NOT be stored.
I then quickly found out that my highlighting code requires the field to
Hi all
How to provide highlighting for fragmented string which is created from
multi-value field using Lucene 5.3.2 ?
Is any known solution for it?
1. Or first approach - merge all multi-value into one single value and
apply
highlighter.getBestTextFragments(tokenStream, text, false, maxNumFragm
sively, the branches of the query tree were getting
trimmed as expected. This actually worked great for the simple "a OR (b AND
z)" case! Though, the entire thing came to a grinding halt with the
realization that I needed to continue to support other fielded searches.
When attempting to high
x27;, but might have matched
for the wrong reason and therefore have mismatched highlighting.
Stuart
-Original Message-
From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2014 2:54 AM
To: Lucene Users
Cc: sdav...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Only highl
Unfortunately, all Lucene's highlighters are "approximate" in this
regard: there is no guarantee that the shown snippets, if they were a
single little document, would have matched the query.
Even the newest highlighter, PostingsHighlighter, doesn't look at
positions, e.g. a P
Hello,
I have recently been given a requirement to improve document highlights within
our system. Unfortunately, the current functionality gives more of a best-guess
on what terms to highlight vs the actual terms to highlight that actually did
perform the match. A couple examples of issues
score);
ht.setTextFragmenter(new NullFragmenter());
markedString = ht.getBestFragment(ctf, myText);
However, if myQuery has a phrase like "john smith", then it will highlight "john" every
place it sees it and "smith" everyplace it sees it regardless of w
enter());
markedString = ht.getBestFragment(ctf, myText);
However, if myQuery has a phrase like "john smith", then it will highlight
"john" every place it sees it and "smith" everyplace it sees it regardless of
whether they are together. Is this expected
the document.
>
> In that document ,i need to highlight only the first sentence which
> matches the search query "Android".say in first page.
>
> is it possible to use PostingsHighlighter to acheive this functionality.
Yes.
PostingsHighlighter lets you specify your own P
Hi Mike,
I am indexing at the document level that is full book to a field.For
Example iam indexing the full book which contains some term say Android at
the first page,last page.
when i do a search,I will get the document.
In that document ,i need to highlight only the first sentence which
gt; > Sentence as highlighted text whether the sentence contains Searched
>> keyword
>> > or not..
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 3:48 PM, VIGNESH S
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Hi
ighlighted text whether the sentence contains Searched
> keyword
> > or not..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 3:48 PM, VIGNESH S
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I need to do highlight the first sen
he sentence contains Searched
> keyword
> > or not..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 3:48 PM, VIGNESH S
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I need to do highlight the first sentence which matches the
er the sentence contains Searched keyword
> or not..
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 3:48 PM, VIGNESH S wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I need to do highlight the first sentence which matches the search keyword
>> in a document using PostingsHighlighte
H S wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I need to do highlight the first sentence which matches the search keyword
> in a document using PostingsHighlighter.
>
> How can i do this
>
> Any Help or suggestions welcome
> --
> Thanks and Regards
> Vignesh Srinivasan
>
>
--
Thanks and Regards
Vignesh Srinivasan
9739135640
You might be able to make a custom scorer that assigns an insanely
great score to the first sentence it's asked to score?
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:18 AM, VIGNESH S wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to do highlight the first sentence whi
Hi,
I need to do highlight the first sentence which matches the search keyword
in a document using PostingsHighlighter.
How can i do this
Any Help or suggestions welcome
--
Thanks and Regards
Vignesh Srinivasan
Hi,
is it possibile to use Lucene Highlighter classes to extract highlight
spans instead of getting the "highlighted" string?
I am using lucene 3.0.3 (and I cannot upgrade version for now).
I have the following snippet of code:
QueryScorer scorer = new QueryScorer(highlightQuery);
files...
It would be very useful. That said being able to highlight words in any
pictorial representation of a document would be a huge bonus.
As starting point I quarried out from
org.apache.lucene.search.highlight.Highlighter the class below which
just returns the Tokens contributing to the
NullFragmenter, but
ther seems to be nothing for highlighting PDF files...
As starting point I quarried out from
org.apache.lucene.search.highlight.Highlighter the class below which
just returns the Tokens contributing to the hit.
Using the returned tokens a PDF highlight file could be easily
Hi all,
in our Lucene 3.0.3-based web application when a user clicks on a hit
link the targeted PDF should be opened in the browser with highlighted hits.
For this purpose using the Acrobat Highlight File (Parameter xml, see
http://www.pdfbox.org/userguide/highlighting.html and
http
--- On Tue, 3/15/11, Cescy wrote:
> From: Cescy
> Subject: About ComplexPhraseQueryParser highlight prob
> To: "java-user"
> Date: Tuesday, March 15, 2011, 11:44 PM
> hi
>
>
> My app can find the document but cannot highlight the
> keywords.
>
>
hi
My app can find the document but cannot highlight the keywords.
ComplexPhraseQueryParser parser = new
ComplexPhraseQueryParser(Version.LUCENE_30, "contents", analyzer);
Query query = parser.parse("\"(great~) sum*\"");
QueryScorer scorer = new QueryS
r [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 5:34 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Highlight Wildcard Queries: Scores
>
> You can always decompose because QueryParser will also decompose and
> will do-the-right-thing (internal using a Ph
-
> From: Wulf Berschin [mailto:bersc...@dosco.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 5:07 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Highlight Wildcard Queries: Scores
>
> Hallo Uwe,
>
> yes, thanks for the hint, that sounds good, but it seems to me I would
the
men
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Wulf Berschin [mailto:bersc...@dosco.de]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 3:56 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: SPAM(5.0) Re: Highlight Wildcard Queries: Scores
Hi Erick,
good points, but:
o: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SPAM(5.0)**** Re: Highlight Wildcard Queries: Scores
>
> Hi Erick,
>
> good points, but:
>
> our index is fed with german text. In german (in contrast to english)
nouns
> are just appended to create new word
Hi Erick,
good points, but:
our index is fed with german text. In german (in contrast to english)
nouns are just appended to create new words. E.g.
Kaffee
Kaffeemaschine
Kaffeemaschinensatzbehälter
In our scenario standard fulltext search on "Maschine" shall present all
of these nouns. That
sco.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 3:24 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Highlight Wildcard Queries: Scores
>
> Sorry for bothering, that was my fault: I my subclass of QueryParser which
> wraps * around the terms I had not yet considered the new
> mu
Sorry for bothering, that was my fault: I my subclass of QueryParser
which wraps * around the terms I had not yet considered the new
multiTermRewriteMethod. After adding these scoring seems to work and
even the rewrite is possible again.
Wulf
Am 26.01.2011 15:10, schrieb Wulf Berschin:
Now I
It is, I think, a legitimate question to ask whether scoring is worthwhile
on wildcards. That is,
does it really improve the user experience? Because the MaxBooleanClause
gets tripped
pretty quickly if you add the terms back in, so you'd have to deal with
that.
Would your users be satisfied with s
Now I have the highlighted wildcards but obviously the scoring is lost.
I see that a rewrite of the wildcard query produces a constant score
query. I added
setMultiTermRewriteMethod(MultiTermQuery.SCORING_BOOLEAN_QUERY_REWRITE);
to my QueryParser instance but no effect. What's to be done now?
Thank you Alexander and Uwe, for your help.
I read Marks explanation but it seems to me that his changes are not
contained in Lucene-3.0.3.
So I commented out the rewrite, changed QueryTermScorer back to
QueryScorer and now I got the wildcard queries highlighted again.
Wulf
--
Removing redundant calls to rewrite was the key when I had this issue
moving from 2.3.x to 3.0.x...
Dawn
On 25/01/2011 20:04, Uwe Schindler wrote:
And: you don't need to rewrite queries before highlighting, highlighter does
this automatically internally if needed.
-
Uwe Schindler
r [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 9:02 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Highlight Wildcard Queries
>
> You can set setExpandMultiTermQuery(true) on QueryScorer (or
> WeightedSpanTermExtractor), which is needed by the Highlighter CTOR -
> tha
...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexander Kanarsky [mailto:kanarsky2...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 8:44 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Highlight Wildcard Queries
>
> Hi Wulf,
>
> Check the http://www.lucidimagination.c
Hi Wulf,
Check the
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/06/08/bringing-the-highlighter-back-to-wildcard-queries-in-solr-14/
this may help. I do not know what of Mark's changes are in Lucene 3.x,
but most likely you
will just need to set a proper RewriteMethod for the MultiTermQuery somewhere
Hi,
I'm just migrating our small search customization from Lucene version
2.3 to the current version (3.0.3) and wonder why, in contrast to the
old version, we no longer get the Wildcard Queries (which are default,
since surround the search string with asterisks) highlighted.
We're using the
Can you just lowercase a dedicated sort field and leave the others alone.
--
Ian.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Kev Kilroy wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Lucene 2.4.1 with Hibernate Search 3.1.1. I have objects in the
> index, for each field I index as follows:
>
> @Fields( value = {
>
Hi,
I'm using Lucene 2.4.1 with Hibernate Search 3.1.1. I have objects in the
index, for each field I index as follows:
@Fields( value = {
@Field(index = Index.TOKENIZED, store = Store.YES),
@Field(name = "name_forSort", index = Index.UN_TOKENIZED, store =
Store.NO),
})
T
If you're searching for terms "giving" and "and", it will only
highlight those terms, not the whole sentence.. that's how the
highlighter is meant to work: highlight what the user did query. Also
there's no built-in concept of sentence.
regards,
Sanne
201
ermExtractor.extract(Query,
>> Map)
>>
>> The query passed to this method is of type
>> org.apache.lucene.search.ConstantScoreQuery, but it matches non of
>> 'instanceof' checkings in this method, so no WeightedSpanTerm is
>> extracted.
>>
>> It this a bug
anceof' checkings in this method, so no WeightedSpanTerm is
> extracted.
>
> It this a bug?
>
> Thanks,
> Mohsen
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Highlighter-doesn%27t-highlight-wildcard-queries-after-updating-to-2.9.1-3.0.0-tp26969517p271067
Just figured out, missed "lucene-memory-2.4.1.jar" external jar inclusion.
With that jar included, "\"Giving and\"~11" only got "Giving" & "and"
highlighted but not the whole sentence, any ideas?
Thanks,
2010/1/11 Li Leon
> *Hi all,*
&
*Hi all,*
**
*I wanted to use to following code to highlight the whole sentence with
"\"something\"~n" to be parsed.*
**
*The QueryParser part worked well, but when integrated with Highlighter, it
ended up with exception. *
**
*Does anyone have any clue as I'm investiga
>>
>> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lu
t;
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in c
Mohsen Saboorian wrote:
> After updating to 2.9.x or 3.0, highlighter doesn't work on wildcard queries
> like "abc*". I thought that it would be because of scoring, so I also set
> myIndexSearcher.setDefaultFieldSortScoring(true, true) before searching.
> I tested with both QueryScorer and QueryTer
.
In my custom highlightTerm(String originalText, TokenGroup tokenGroup)
method, tokenGroup.getTotalScore() is always <= 0 for these queries.
Mohsen
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Highlighter-doesn%27t-highlight-wildcard-queries-after-updating-to-2.9.1-3.0.0-tp26969517p26969
It could be the "merge contiguous fragments" feature that attempts to
do exactly this to improve readability
It's an option you can turn off.
On 15 Nov 2009, at 01:21, Felipe Lobo wrote:
Hi, i'm having some problems with the size of the fragmentes when
i'm doing
Hi, i'm having some problems with the size of the fragmentes when i'm doing
the highlight. I pass on the constructor of the SimpleSpanFragmenter a size
of 80, but i'm having some fragments of 500.
But it only happen when i do searches with 3 or more words.
What i notice is that he t
AHMET ARSLAN wrote:
>> Looks like its because the query
>> coming in is a ComplexPhraseQuery and
>> the Highlighter doesn't current know how to handle that
>> type.
>>
>> It would need to be rewritten first barring the special
>> handling it
>> needs - but unfortunately, that will break multi-term
> Looks like its because the query
> coming in is a ComplexPhraseQuery and
> the Highlighter doesn't current know how to handle that
> type.
>
> It would need to be rewritten first barring the special
> handling it
> needs - but unfortunately, that will break multi-term query
> highlighting
> unle
the same query string is
>> parsed by Lucene's default QueryParser highlighting comes.
>>
>> I am trying to highlight full original text, preserving
>> proximity criteria.
>> Choice of FastVectorHighlighter or Highlighter is not
>> important for me.
>&
hting comes.
>
> I am trying to highlight full original text, preserving
> proximity criteria.
> Choice of FastVectorHighlighter or Highlighter is not
> important for me.
>
> I was using ComplexPhraseQueryParser with solr 1.3.0,
> without problems with PhraseHighlighter
cene's default QueryParser
highlighting comes.
I am trying to highlight full original text, preserving proximity criteria.
Choice of FastVectorHighlighter or Highlighter is not important for me.
I was using ComplexPhraseQueryParser with solr 1.3.0, without problems with
PhraseHighlighter. But
eople that can possibly help or
add valuable input.
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
AHMET ARSLAN wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> I am using LUCENE-1486. I am having highlighting problems with it.
> With solr 1.3.0 it was working with hl.usePhraseHighlighter=true which uses
> Spa
I am having the following method to highlight the terms.
public static String getHighlighter(String colName, Highlighter
highlighter,IndexSearcher searcher,int id, Analyzer analyzer) throws
IOException {
String highlightTerm;
TokenStream tokenStream
Currently I am following a long drawn approach where
1) I find index of the matching text in the original
2) For a list of words to the left of index and to the right of index+length
of matching text
3) Then a pick some words from the 1st list and prepend to my matching text
text and from my secon
Hi all,
I am using *SimpleSpanFragment *to find the words a few positions around the
match.
I am specifying the number of characters, which is the second parameter of
the *SimpleSpanFragment *constructor .
However, it always gives the words to the right of the match and does not
give me the word
Hello,
I am wondering whether using Lucene Highlighter it is possible to highlight
parts of words. So for instance, if I type A then in word America I would
have America or if I type er I would get America
Thanks for replies
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/One-character
located in the highlighter contrib jar...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp/lucene-old$ tar -xzf lucene-2.2.0.tar.gz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp/lucene-old$ find lucene-2.2.0 | grep highlight | grep
jar
lucene-2.2.0/contrib/highlighter/lucene-highlighter-2.
gt;
> b) but none of those contain the package
> "org.apache.lucene.search.highlight"
>
> c) I can get the HEAD stream code for the package
>"org.apache.lucene.search.highlight" by checking out the "highlight"
>project through SVN, but that
ot;
c) I can get the HEAD stream code for the package
"org.apache.lucene.search.highlight" by checking out the "highlight"
project through SVN, but that gets me 2.4-level code
(using http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf).
How can I get the 2.2.0-level &q
it works!! Thanks
I believe Highlighter.setMaxDocBytesToAnalyze(int byteCount) should be used
for this.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:40 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am using Highlighter to highlight query terms in documents getting from a
> database founded
I believe Highlighter.setMaxDocBytesToAnalyze(int byteCount) should be used
for this.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:40 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am using Highlighter to highlight query terms in documents getting from a
> database founded from lucene search.
&g
Hello
I am using Highlighter to highlight query terms in documents getting
from a database founded from lucene search.
My problem is that when i display the full document, highlighter works
fine for most of documents but if the document is huge the highlighter
returns only a part of
and then the to get the
corresponding record from database. My problem is that: i want to
highlight the field with HTML query string that using on searching.
Is it possible to do with Hightlighter or i must write my own class?
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Because there are no matches? Have
highlight a text
public String highlight(String text, String query ) throws IOException {
TermQuery query = new TermQuery(new Term("f", query));
QueryScorer scorer = new QueryScorer(query);
SimpleHTMLFormatter formatter =
new SimpleHTMLFormatter("",
Coast US time.
It just clutters email and makes it less likely that you will get a
response.
-Grant
On Jun 26, 2008, at 3:48 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
i am having the following code to highlight a text
public String highlight(String text, String query ) throws
IOException {
T
Hello
i am having the following code to highlight a text
public String highlight(String text, String query ) throws IOException {
TermQuery query = new TermQuery(new Term("f", query));
QueryScorer scorer = new QueryScorer(query);
SimpleHTMLFormatter formatter =
Hello
i am having the following code to highlight a text
public String highlight(String text, String query ) throws IOException {
TermQuery query = new TermQuery(new Term("f", query));
QueryScorer scorer = new QueryScorer(query);
SimpleHTMLFormatter formatter =
Hi Ravinder
Checkout Highlighter.test in
lucene-2.3.1\contrib\highlighter\src\test\org\apache\lucene\search\highl
ight\ folder
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 February 2008 11:03
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Lucene-Highlight
Hi All,
How do we Highlight words in a searched docs. Please give inputs on
"rewritten query as the input for the highlighter, i.e. call rewrite()
on the query".
Thanks,
Ravinder
DISCLAIMER:
This message contains privileged and confidential information and is intended
o
rough them.
Lucene works great! I create index, analyzer, send query, get hits...
The problem is that one of the text of the collection is always displayed in a
JTextArea, and I want to be able to highlight, mark out in color, the words
that match the query.
Now, there is the Highlighter in Java
in [Name] and
[Title] fields?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/highlight-only-some-terms-from-query-string--tf4392290.html#a12522976
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To
The fastest way to see if opening/closing your searcher is a problem would
be to write a tiny little program that opened the index, fired off a few
queries and timed each one. The queries can be canned, of course. I'm
thinking this is, say, less that 20 lines (including imports). If you're
familia
Hi,
I have a collection of 500 txt documents and I implement a web
application(JSP) for searching these documents.
In addition, the application shows the BestFragment of each result and
highlights the query terms.
My application is slow enough (about 2,5-3 seconds for each query) even if I
run it
tokenStream,
text,
maxNumFragmentsRequired,
fragmentSeparator);
}
}
else
{
System.out.println("No Matches found to highl
Thx a lot!
2006/9/26, markharw00d <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Pass a field name to the QueryScorer constructor.
See "testFieldSpecificHighlighting" method in the Junit test for the
highlighter for an example.
Cheers
Mark
zhu jiang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>For example, if I have a document with two f
Pass a field name to the QueryScorer constructor.
See "testFieldSpecificHighlighting" method in the Junit test for the
highlighter for an example.
Cheers
Mark
zhu jiang wrote:
Hi all,
For example, if I have a document with two fields text and num like
this:
text:foo bar
Hi all,
For example, if I have a document with two fields text and num like
this:
text:foo bar 1
num:1
When users query "foo", I changed the query to "text:foo AND num:1", both
"foo" and "1" in the text field will be highlighted. I don't wanna the word
"1" in
(for example "w1 w2
WITHIN 4" to find all documents where the distance between w1 and
w2 and less or equals to 4)
For all documents matching the query, I need to know the
corresponding occurences (w1, w2) to highlight them (and so exclude
all other w1 and w2 which are no r
Hi All,
I use proximity operator in my queries (for example "w1 w2 WITHIN 4" to
find all documents where the distance between w1 and w2 and less or equals to
4)
For all documents matching the query, I need to know the corresponding
occurences (w1, w2) to highlight th
returnString =
highlighter.getBestFragments(
tokenStream,
text,
maxNumFragmentsRequired,
fragmentSeparator);
}
}
else
er jar from the lucene-sandbox and see the examples from this downloaded folder.
Get the Search Results from the Hits and pass this string to the highlighter class.
if you still need help... please ping, i can pass you some code on.
On Sat, 2006-08-12 at 00:33 +0800, kevin wrote:
Hi,
how t
need help... please ping, i can pass you some code on.
On Sat, 2006-08-12 at 00:33 +0800, kevin wrote:
Hi,
how to highlight the search key word in lucene's search results? pls
give advise,thanks!
-
To unsubscribe, e
This is in the FAQ:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/LuceneFAQ#head-75566820ee94a425c7e2950ac61d24e405fbd914
Citerar kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
> how to highlight the search key word in lucene's search results? pls
>
Hi,
how to highlight the search key word in lucene's search results? pls
give advise,thanks!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
I wrote a program that make a pdf document to an Lucene document. The
field ate "contents", "sentence", :
How do i display the sentence the query String is in? and how do I
Highlight the String?
cheers
anton feldmann
package de.coli.seek.lucene;
import
Thanks!
Yes you're right. Highlight all hits at one time may cause problems. A hits
paging method is needed to avoid this.
Another, if we read the contents of the original file into a string, passing
it to the highlighter at the searching stage, this also could cause problems
when
On 27 Nov 2005, at 00:24, Jerry Stern wrote:
I wonder how to highlight the searched word when full-text
searching performed based on Lucene.
At the indexing stage, the contents of a original file is
regarded as a FIELD of a Lucene document:
private static void indexFile(File file
Hi all,
I wonder how to highlight the searched word when full-text searching
performed based on Lucene.
At the indexing stage, the contents of a original file is regarded as a FIELD
of a Lucene document:
private static void indexFile(File file, IndexWriter idxWriter)
throws IOException
--- Ernesto De Santis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Mark
This don't work, because
WeightedTerm[] weightedTerm =
QueryTermExtractor.getTerms(query);
return query terms values , not the fields names.
example:
for "body:mark title:highlight"
return [mark, highlight], I
ry);
>
> return query terms values , not the fields names.
> example:
> for "body:mark title:highlight"
>
> return [mark, highlight], I can't compare this
> values with "body" field.
>
> Ernesto.
>
> mark harwood escribió:
>
> >Ah. Yo
Hi Mark
This don't work, because
WeightedTerm[] weightedTerm = QueryTermExtractor.getTerms(query);
return query terms values , not the fields names.
example:
for "body:mark title:highlight"
return [mark, highlight], I can't compare this values with "body"
Ah. You're right. Looks like the current highlighter
api doesn't offer you that degree of control.
The way to fix it is probably to tweak the list of
WeightedTerms you give the highlighter:
[psuedo code follows...]
terms=QueryTermExtractor.getTerms(query);
bodyQueryTerms=new ArrayList();
for all
Hi
I'm using highlighter and have this problem:
The query is over two or more fields, like:
*body:home AND title:sale*
I want to highlight over body field, but not highlight "sale" if "sale"
is in body.
How I can do this?
When I create a Highlighter instance, t
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
