Re: IndexFileNameFilter

2013-09-18 Thread Adrien Grand
Hi, On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Yonghui Zhao wrote: > Got it. Currently I don't use any custom codecs. Part of the problem is that even the current codec keeps evolving, and file extensions that exist today might not be used anymore in 6 months and vice-versa. I would strongly recommend not

Re: IndexFileNameFilter

2013-09-18 Thread Yonghui Zhao
e any file extension. > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Yonghui Zhao > wrote: > > In lucene 4.3.0 there is no IndexFileNameFilter. > > > > And I find in org.apache.lucene.index.IndexFileNames the index file > > extensions have only 3 types. > > > &g

Re: IndexFileNameFilter

2013-09-18 Thread Adrien Grand
no IndexFileNameFilter. > > And I find in org.apache.lucene.index.IndexFileNames the index file > extensions have only 3 types. > > > public static final String INDEX_EXTENSIONS[] = new String[] { > COMPOUND_FILE_EXTENSION, > COMPOUND_FILE_ENTRIES_EXTENSION, > G

IndexFileNameFilter

2013-09-18 Thread Yonghui Zhao
In lucene 4.3.0 there is no IndexFileNameFilter. And I find in org.apache.lucene.index.IndexFileNames the index file extensions have only 3 types. public static final String INDEX_EXTENSIONS[] = new String[] { COMPOUND_FILE_EXTENSION, COMPOUND_FILE_ENTRIES_EXTENSION, GEN_EXTENSION