: Sorry if the question is trivial but why not a Hits.doc(int,FieldSelector)
: method?
As i said before...
>> Lazy loading stored fields is really about perfermance tweaking ... if
>> yoiu are that concerned baout performance, you shouldn't be using Hits at
>> all.
...there is a lot of info in
Sorry if the question is trivial but why not a Hits.doc(int,FieldSelector)
method?
On 3/23/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
please read the answer i gave you the last time you asked this question...
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Lazy-field-loading-in-p9604064.html
: Hi
please read the answer i gave you the last time you asked this question...
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Lazy-field-loading-in-p9604064.html
: Hi
: I am seeking for making use of the latest lazy field loading in lucene 2.1.
: I store the orignal bytes of a document, say a PDF file for example
Hi
I am seeking for making use of the latest lazy field loading in lucene 2.1.
I store the orignal bytes of a document, say a PDF file for example, in a
special untokenized field in the index. Though there is enough facilities in
IndexReader class for lazy field loading, the search API in
: IndexReader class for lazy field loading, the search API in IndexSearcher
: does not contain such facilities. Hence, the Documents I get from the
: Hits.doc() would not benefit from the mentioned feature.
Lazy loading stored fields is really about perfermance tweaking ... if
yoiu are that conce
Hi
I am seeking for making use of the latest lazy field loading in lucene 2.1.
I store the orignal bytes of a document, say a PDF file for example, in a
special untokenized field in the index. Though there is enough facilities in
IndexReader class for lazy field loading, the search API in
