Re: Lucene + LSI

by LDA, I mean "Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA)" by David Blei. On 12/20/05, Chandana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > This might be a little off topic to lucene. But i guess it is still in the > interest of IR. > I wanted a rough idea on what applications/fields LDA has been used an

Re: Lucene + LSI

Hi all, This might be a little off topic to lucene. But i guess it is still in the interest of IR. I wanted a rough idea on what applications/fields LDA has been used and observations. If any body did a simlar study (other than that given in the paper by Blei et al . ), that will be of great help

Re: Lucene + LSI

Thanks for these helpful links. Adam On 14/12/05, Dave Kor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12/13/05, Dave Kor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12/13/05, Ian Soboroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > We're also thinking about implementing

Re: Lucene + LSI

On 12/13/05, Dave Kor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/13/05, Ian Soboroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > We're also thinking about implementing something similar to LSI within > > > ActiveMath which is lucene-powered where both formulae and te

Re: Lucene + LSI

I'm sure your evaluation is correct from the inspection I have made of the NITLE effort, e.g. the need for tweaking. I will follow up your links when I have a chance, and thank you for them. I didn't know that about Maciej Ceglowski. People do move on. I wish him luck (in case he is reading this or

Re: Lucene + LSI

On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 10:53:42AM +, adasal wrote: > There seem to be quite a few alternatives around. I would be interested in > comments on the following:- > The work at NITLE > using Contextual > Network Search (CNS) a graph-based alternative

Re: Lucene + LSI

There seem to be quite a few alternatives around. I would be interested in comments on the following:- The work at NITLE using Contextual Network Search (CNS) a graph-based alternative to LSI. This work *[PDF]* An Introduction to *Random* Indexing

Re: Lucene + LSI

On 12/13/05, Ian Soboroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > We're also thinking about implementing something similar to LSI within > > ActiveMath which is lucene-powered where both formulae and text > > searching would benefit of the latent-semantic-simil

Re: Lucene + LSI

Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We're also thinking about implementing something similar to LSI within > ActiveMath which is lucene-powered where both formulae and text > searching would benefit of the latent-semantic-similarity. I've been > refrained of doing "exactly this" at least

Re: Lucene + LSI

PROTECTED]> wrote: sorry have to ask - whats LSI - " latent semantic indexing"? _gk - Original Message - From: "Lorenzo Viscanti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 12:02 AM Subject: Re: Lucene + LSI It de

Re: Lucene + LSI

t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 12:02 AM > Subject: Re: Lucene + LSI > > > It depends on the kind of implementation you are thinking of. > You can use Lucene to create the inputs to the LSI, and then use them in > your own system. I've written th

Re: Lucene + LSI

sorry have to ask - whats LSI - " latent semantic indexing"? _gk - Original Message - From: "Lorenzo Viscanti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 12:02 AM Subject: Re: Lucene + LSI It depends on the kind of

Re: Lucene + LSI

It depends on the kind of implementation you are thinking of. You can use Lucene to create the inputs to the LSI, and then use them in your own system. I've written that code and it works, for searches and clustering. But if you are figuring out an LSI enhanced Lucene search system (based on a spec

Lucene + LSI

Have any one implemented LSI in Lucene? Kindly let me know how hard/easy it is. thanks chandana