d', but might have
> matched for the wrong reason and therefore have mismatched highlighting.
>
>
> Stuart
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
> Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2014 2:54 AM
> To: Lucene Use
ight terms that caused a search hit/match
Unfortunately, all Lucene's highlighters are "approximate" in this
regard: there is no guarantee that the shown snippets, if they were a single
little document, would have matched the query.
Even the newest highlighter, PostingsHighlighter, d
Unfortunately, all Lucene's highlighters are "approximate" in this
regard: there is no guarantee that the shown snippets, if they were a
single little document, would have matched the query.
Even the newest highlighter, PostingsHighlighter, doesn't look at
positions, e.g. a PhraseQuery highlight c
Hello,
I have recently been given a requirement to improve document highlights within
our system. Unfortunately, the current functionality gives more of a best-guess
on what terms to highlight vs the actual terms to highlight that actually did
perform the match. A couple examples of issues that
