Re: EXCEPTION LUCENE 1.4.3 + LUKE

2005-04-04 Thread Paul Elschot
gt; > > with regards > > Karthik > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 3:28 PM > > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Re: EXCEPTION LUCENE 1.4.3 + LU

Re: EXCEPTION LUCENE 1.4.3 + LUKE

2005-04-04 Thread Erik Hatcher
m: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 3:28 PM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: EXCEPTION LUCENE 1.4.3 + LUKE I haven't looked at Luke's source code to confirm, but my hunch is that Luke is upping the maximum clause count of BooleanQuery. (see Boole

Re: EXCEPTION LUCENE 1.4.3 + LUKE

2005-04-04 Thread Andrzej Bialecki
Erik Hatcher wrote: I haven't looked at Luke's source code to confirm, but my hunch is that Luke is upping the maximum clause count of BooleanQuery. (see BooleanQuery.setMaxClauseCount()) No, it doesn't. The reason for that exception NOT occuring with Luke is simply the fact that Luke uses Lu

RE: EXCEPTION LUCENE 1.4.3 + LUKE

2005-04-04 Thread Karthik N S
@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: EXCEPTION LUCENE 1.4.3 + LUKE I haven't looked at Luke's source code to confirm, but my hunch is that Luke is upping the maximum clause count of BooleanQuery. (see BooleanQuery.setMaxClauseCount()) Erik On Apr 4, 2005, at 5:01 AM, Karthik N S wrote: >  

Re: EXCEPTION LUCENE 1.4.3 + LUKE

2005-04-04 Thread Erik Hatcher
I haven't looked at Luke's source code to confirm, but my hunch is that Luke is upping the maximum clause count of BooleanQuery. (see BooleanQuery.setMaxClauseCount()) Erik On Apr 4, 2005, at 5:01 AM, Karthik N S wrote:    Hi guys Apologies..   Using a MultiFieldQueryParser