accept my apologies for not confirming the sent address.
i will try 8.1 tomorrow on my env.
baris
- Original Message -
From: tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2019 10:35:26 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: FuzzyQuery- why is it
my env.
baris
- Original Message -
From: tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2019 10:35:26 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: FuzzyQuery- why is it ignored?
Please send messages to java-user mail list only. It is not
recommended
gt; baris
>
> - Original Message -
> From: tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com
> To: baris.ka...@oracle.com
> Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2019 9:14:22 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: FuzzyQuery- why is it ignored?
>
> > If You could index these entries and stil
s a bug in Lucene 6.6.
Best regards
- Original Message -
From: baris.ka...@oracle.com
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org, tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com,
erickerick...@gmail.com, a...@linux.com, baris.ka...@oracle.com,
luc...@mikemccandless.com
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2019 10:49:05 AM GMT -05:00 US/C
thanks for confirming. StandardAnalyzer does not do stemming.
So, MAINS case has some other reason.
Best regards
- Original Message -
From: tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2019 4:39:29 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: FuzzyQuery
16, 2019 4:39:29 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: FuzzyQuery- why is it ignored?
Hi,
you said you are using standard analyzer. If so, you are not using any
stemmer at all (please see the analyzer's Javadocs).
2019年6月16日(日) 11:43 Baris Kazar :
>
> Hello,-
> Erick ex
ck...@gmail.com, a...@linux.com, baris.ka...@oracle.com,
> luc...@mikemccandless.com
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2019 10:48:47 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: FuzzyQuery- why is it ignored?
>
> i see, i am using an older version 6.6 and we should switch to Your 8.1
&g
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org, tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com,
erickerick...@gmail.com, a...@linux.com, baris.ka...@oracle.com,
luc...@mikemccandless.com
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2019 10:48:47 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: FuzzyQuery- why is it ignored?
i see, i am using an older
i see, i am using an older version 6.6 and we should switch to Your 8.1
version of at least 7.X.
Tomoko i think i understood You meant MAIN NASHUA for the string :)
Again i really appreciate all answers.
How do we disable or enable stemming while indexing? :) another question.
Best regar
Sorry, I made a mistake when copypasting. Let me just correct my previous mail.
> 1. Indexed this text: "NASHUA NASHUA HILLSBOROUGH NEW HAMPSHIRE UNITED
> STATES".
1. Indexed this text: "MAIN DUNSTABLE NASHUA HILLSBOROUGH NEW
HAMPSHIRE UNITED STATES"
As far as I can say, this query correct
However, the index does not have MAINS but MAIN for the expected entry.
Best regards
On 6/13/19 10:33 AM, baris.ka...@oracle.com wrote:
does it consider it as like plural word? :) :) :)
That makes sense.
Best regards
On 6/13/19 10:31 AM, baris.ka...@oracle.com wrote:
Erick,
Cool, could Y
does it consider it as like plural word? :) :) :)
That makes sense.
Best regards
On 6/13/19 10:31 AM, baris.ka...@oracle.com wrote:
Erick,
Cool, could You give a simple example with my example please?
Best regards
On 6/13/19 10:12 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
Shot in the dark: stemming. When
Erick,
Cool, could You give a simple example with my example please?
Best regards
On 6/13/19 10:12 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
Shot in the dark: stemming. Whenever I see a problem with something ending in
“s” (or “er” or “ing” or….) my first suspect is that stemming is turned on. In
that cas
Shot in the dark: stemming. Whenever I see a problem with something ending in
“s” (or “er” or “ing” or….) my first suspect is that stemming is turned on. In
that case the token in the index that’s actually searched on is somewhat
different than you expect.
The test is easy, just insure your fie
Tomoko,-
That is strange indeed.
Something is wrong when i use mains but maink, mainl, mainr,mainq, maint
all work ok any consonant at the end except s works in this case.
Case #3 had +contentDFLT:mains~2 but not +contentDFLT:"mains~2".
i am using fuzzy query with ~ from Query.builder and t
Hi,
> Ok, i think only this very specific only "mains" has an issue.
It looks strange to me. I did some test locally.
1. Indexed this text: "NASHUA NASHUA HILLSBOROUGH NEW HAMPSHIRE UNITED STATES".
2a. This query string (just copied from your Case #3) worked correctly
for me as far as I can see
Ok, i think only this very specific only "mains" has an issue.
all i knew about Lucene was fine :) Great...
i have one more question:
which one is advised to use: FuzzyQuery or the Query.parser with search
string~ appended?
The second one will go through analyzer and make search string lower
Hi again,-
this is really interesting and i hope i am missing something. Index
small cases all entries so case sensitivity is not an issue i think.
Case #1:
org.apache.lucene.queryparser.classic.QueryParser parser = new
org.apache.lucene.queryparser.classic.QueryParser(field, phraseAnalyzer)
Tomoko,-
Thank You for Your suggestions. i am trying to understand it and i
thought i did :)
but it does not work with FuzzyQuery when i used with a *single* large
TextField like street=...value... city=...value... region=...value...
country=...value... (with or without quotes for the value
I'd suggest to correctly understand the way a software works before
suspecting its bug :-)
I guess you may miss two points:
1. the standard analyzer (standard tokenizer) breaks words by double
quote (U+0022) so quotes are not indexed or searched at all if you are
using standard analyzer. (That is
i can say that quotes is not the issue with index as it still results in
same results with quotes or without quotes.
i am starting to feel that this might be a bug maybe??
Best regards
On 6/10/19 2:46 PM, baris.ka...@oracle.com wrote:
Somehow " is causing an issue as this should return stree
I would suggest using a QueryParser for your fuzzy query before adding it
to the Boolean query. This should weed out any case issues.
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 at 8:06 PM, wrote:
> BooleanQuery.Builder booleanQuery = new BooleanQuery.Builder();
>
> //First set
>
> booleanQuery.add(new FuzzyQue
Somehow " is causing an issue as this should return street with MAIN:
[contentDFLT:street="MAINS"~2, +contentDFLT:"city nashua",
+contentDFLT:"region new-hampshire", +contentDFLT:"country united states"]
Best regards
On 6/10/19 2:24 PM, baris.ka...@oracle.com wrote:
[+contentDFLT:"city nashu
[+contentDFLT:"city nashua", +contentDFLT:"region new-hampshire",
+contentDFLT:"country united states", contentDFLT:street contentDFLT:mains]
QueeryParser chops it into two pieces from
parser.parser("street=\"MAINS\"");
Index has a TextField named contentDFLT the following data :
street="MAIN
Or, " (double quotation) in your query string may affect query parsing.
When I parse this string by classic query parser (lucene 8.1),
street="MAINS~"
parsed (raw) query is
text:street text:mains
(I set the default search field to "text", so text: is appeared here.)
Query parsing is a complex
Hi,
I noticed one small thing in your previous mail.
> when i use q1 = parser.parse("street=\"MAIN\""); i get same results
which is good.
To specify a search field, ":" (colon) should be used instead of "=".
See the query parser documentation:
http://lucene.apache.org/core/8_1_0/queryparser/org/
booleanQuery.add(Utils.createPhraseQuery(phraseAnalyzer, field,
"city=\"NASHUA\""), BooleanClause.Occur.MUST);
booleanQuery.add(Utils.createPhraseQuery(phraseAnalyzer, field,
"region=\"NEW HAMPSHIRE\""), BooleanClause.Occur.MUST);
booleanQuery.add(Utils.createPhraseQuery(phraseAna
Hi,
just for the basic verification, can you find the document without
fuzzy query? I mean, does this query work for you?
Query query = parser.parse("MAIN");
Tomoko
2019年6月11日(火) 0:22 :
>
> why cant the second set not work at all?
>
> it is indexed as Textfield like street="..." city="..." etc.
why cant the second set not work at all?
it is indexed as Textfield like street="..." city="..." etc.
Best regards
On 6/10/19 11:23 AM, baris.ka...@oracle.com wrote:
i dont know how to use Fuzzyquery with queryparser but probably You
are suggesting
QueryParser parser = new QueryParser(fiel
i dont know how to use Fuzzyquery with queryparser but probably You are
suggesting
QueryParser parser = new QueryParser(field, analyzer) ;
Query query = parser.parse("MAINS~2");
booleanQuery.add(query, BooleanClause.Occur.SHOULD);
am i right?
Best regards
On 6/10/19 10:47 AM, Atri Sharma wro
i am using standardanalyzer.
Best regards
On 6/9/19 11:22 AM, Tomoko Uchida wrote:
Hi,
What analyzer do you use for the text field? Is the term "Main"
correctly indexed?
2019年6月8日(土) 9:13 Baris Kazar :
Hi,-
i cant get FuzzyQuery working for searching with a query like Mains~2 to find
the
How do i check how it is indexed? lowecase or uppercase?
only way is now to by testing.
i am using standardanalyzer.
Best regards
On 6/9/19 11:57 AM, Atri Sharma wrote:
On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 8:53 PM Tomoko Uchida
wrote:
Hi,
What analyzer do you use for the text field? Is the term "Main"
On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 8:53 PM Tomoko Uchida
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> What analyzer do you use for the text field? Is the term "Main"
> correctly indexed?
Agreed. Also, it would be good if you could post your actual code.
What analyzer are you using? If you are using StandardAnalyzer, then
all of your
Hi,
What analyzer do you use for the text field? Is the term "Main"
correctly indexed?
2019年6月8日(土) 9:13 Baris Kazar :
>
> Hi,-
> i cant get FuzzyQuery working for searching with a query like Mains~2 to
> find the word Main in a TextField.
> Any suggestions please?
>
> -
You mean the total number of edits between those strings must be <= 2?
If so, you must index the entire "Lucene Apache Group" as a single
token, and likewise do a FuzzyQuery with the entire "Luceni Apachi
Group", etc.
If instead you do tokenize and use BooleanQuery to combine them, then
that allo
oc update. Again, apologies to all if I missed this
> point in the documentation.
>
> Best,
>
> Tim
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 7:19 AM
> To: Lucene Users
> Subje
]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 7:19 AM
To: Lucene Users
Subject: Re: FuzzyQuery with short words
I think so? The default prefixLength is 0 ...
Just make sure you're not hitting the maxExpansions limit (default is
50). Ie, if your index has many other terms within edit distance 2 o
I think so? The default prefixLength is 0 ...
Just make sure you're not hitting the maxExpansions limit (default is
50). Ie, if your index has many other terms within edit distance 2 of
"ab" or edit distance 1 of "x" then then may cause your example "abcd"
to rank below the top 50, and be pruned
FWIW, new FuzzyQuery(term, 2 ,0) is the same as new FuzzyQuery(term), given
the current values of defaultMaxEdits (2) and defaultPrefixLength (0).
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ian Lea
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 9:44 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re
See the javadocs for FuzzyQuery to see what the parameters are. I
can't tell you what the comment means. Possible values to try maybe?
--
Ian.
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 2:34 PM, algebra wrote:
> is true Ian, o code is good.
>
> The only thing that I dont understand is a line:
>
> Query query =
is true Ian, o code is good.
The only thing that I dont understand is a line:
Query query = new FuzzyQuery(term, 2 ,0); //0-2
Whats means 0 to 2?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/FuzzyQuery-in-lucene-4-0-tp4031871p4031879.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Us
What adjustments did you make? One of them might be to blame.
But at a glance the code looks fine to me. In what way is it not
working? Care to provide any input/output/details of what
does/doesn't work?
--
Ian.
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 2:03 PM, algebra wrote:
> I was using lucene 3.6 and my
Please do not highack the thread. When starting a new topic, do NOT
use "reply to", start an entirely new e-mail. Otherwise your topic often
gets ignored by people who are uninterested in the original thread.
Best
Erick
On Dec 17, 2007 5:57 AM, anjana m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how to i use
Hi anjana m,
You're going to have lots of trouble getting a response, for two reasons:
1. You are replying to an existing thread and changing the subject. Don't do
that. When you have a question, start a new thread by creating a new email
instead of replying.
2. You are not telling the list
On Dec 17, 2007, at 3:31 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
FuzzyQuery (in the 2.2.0 API) may take 3 arguments,
term , minimumSimilarity and prefixLength
Is there any syntax to specify the 3rd argument
in a query term for QueryParser?
(I haven't found any the current docs)
No, there isn't. But you
hey i amnot bale to comple packages are not found..
i download..the luncene package..
help me..
.lucene.search.Hits;
import org.apache.lucene.search.Query;
import org.apache.lucene.document.Field;
import org.apache.lucene.search.Searcher;
import org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter;
import org.apach
See in Lucene FAQ:
"Are Wildcard, Prefix, and Fuzzy queries case sensitive?"
On Dec 17, 2007 11:27 AM, Helmut Jarausch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please help I am totally puzzled.
>
> The same query, once with a direct call to FuzzyQuery
> succeeds while the same query with QueryParse
how to i use lucene search to serach files of the local system
On Dec 17, 2007 2:11 PM, Helmut Jarausch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> according to the LiA book the FuzzyQuery distance is computed as
>
> 1- distance / min(textlen,targetlen)
>
> Given
> def addDoc(text, writer):
>doc = D
48 matches
Mail list logo
