Re: Index result percentile variation based on Index time Norm and No-Norm

2011-06-19 Thread Simon Willnauer
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Saurabh Gokhale wrote: > Yes, it makes sense. So in the case of No_Norm I suppose, all the fields > small or large, are treated the same instead of as per their sizes and > implicit boost factor. well yes they will use TF / IDF for scoring additional length normal

Re: Index result percentile variation based on Index time Norm and No-Norm

2011-06-19 Thread Saurabh Gokhale
Yes, it makes sense. So in the case of No_Norm I suppose, all the fields small or large, are treated the same instead of as per their sizes and implicit boost factor. Thanks for the explanation Saurabh On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Simon Willnauer < simon.willna...@googlemail.com> wrote: > i

Re: Index result percentile variation based on Index time Norm and No-Norm

2011-06-19 Thread Simon Willnauer
if you use norms lucene uses the boost of the fields / document and multiplies it with a length normalization factor -> 1.0 / Math.sqrt(numTerms) so you scores should be different. Does that explain what you are seeing? Simon On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Saurabh Gokhale wrote: > Hi All, > I