You have to reindex.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: ash nix [mailto:nixd...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 4:57 PM
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: re-indexing a f
On 25/04/2012 13:58, Erick Erickson wrote:
There's no update-in-place, currently you _have_ to re-index the
entire document.
But to the original question:
There is a "limited join" capability you might investigate that would
allow you to split up the textual data and metadata into two different
Am Donnerstag, den 26.04.2012, 09:46 +0530 schrieb KARTHIK SHIVAKUMAR:
> Then delete the same and insert the same Fresh Document alone.
But that is not "update" like the question was - that is a complete
reindex of the original document, the original question was, if updating
a field of a doc can
Hi
>>"Update Index" for the dynamic data
I have done this in Past ..It worked for me long time ago,
All u need is have a piece of Code to Search and find the Specific Doc
within the Index's ( probably using the Unique name for document )
Then delete the same and insert the same Fresh Documen
There's no update-in-place, currently you _have_ to re-index the
entire document.
But to the original question:
There is a "limited join" capability you might investigate that would
allow you to split up the textual data and metadata into two different
documents and join them. I don't know how we
Am Dienstag, den 24.04.2012, 21:57 +0530 schrieb KARTHIK SHIVAKUMAR:
> Simple Techniques is to use "Update Index" for the dynamic data
> colum
>
> rather then re-indexing the whole document.
Just for interest, how do you do that?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Hi
Simple Techniques is to use "Update Index" for the dynamic data colum
rather then re-indexing the whole document.
with regards
karthik
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Jong Kim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm sure that this is very common use case that probably hundreds of people
> have asked t
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Jong Kim wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> Our metadata is not stored in a single field, but is rather a collection of
> fields. So, it requires a boolean search that spans multiple fields. My
> understanding is that it is not possible to iterate over the matching
Thanks for the reply.
Our metadata is not stored in a single field, but is rather a collection of
fields. So, it requires a boolean search that spans multiple fields. My
understanding is that it is not possible to iterate over the matching
documents efficiently using termDocs() when the search inv
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Jong Kim wrote:
> Is there any good way to solve this design problem? Obviously, an
> alternative design would be to split the index into two, and maintain
> static (and large) data in one index and the other dynamic part in the
> other index. However, this approa
On Jun 24, 2005, at 3:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does lucene have adaptive re-indexing option? I have indexed
several large
tables. I need to add extra documents to the tables every now and
then. Do
I need to re-index the whole table all the time or there is any way
to add
the new doc
11 matches
Mail list logo
