gt; > > > Even retrieving single document 8.7.0 is more than x2 slower
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 2:28 PM Diego Ceccarelli (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON)
> <
> > > > dceccarel...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > I t
i (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) <
> > > dceccarel...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > I think it will be similar ratio retrieving any number of
> documents.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure this is true, if you retrieve a huge amount
content from Lucene you are also dealing with how the
operating system decides to load the content in memory.
Cheers,
Diego
From: java-user@lucene.apache.org At: 01/22/21 15:22:32To:
java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Slower document retrieval in 8.7.0 comparing to 7.5.0
Just played
gt; wrote:
> >
> > > > I think it will be similar ratio retrieving any number of documents.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure this is true, if you retrieve a huge amount of documents
> you
> > > might cause troubles to the GC.
> > >
> > > From: ja
he GC.
> >
> > From: java-user@lucene.apache.org At: 01/22/21 12:11:19To:
> > java-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Slower document retrieval in 8.7.0 comparing to 7.5.0
> >
> > The accent should not be on retrieved documents number, but on the
> durati
ou retrieve a huge amount of documents you
> might cause troubles to the GC.
>
> From: java-user@lucene.apache.org At: 01/22/21 12:11:19To:
> java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Slower document retrieval in 8.7.0 comparing to 7.5.0
>
> The accent should not be on retrieve
wer document retrieval in 8.7.0 comparing to 7.5.0
The accent should not be on retrieved documents number, but on the duration
ratio - 8.7.0 is 3 times slower. I think it will be similar ratio
retrieving any number of documents.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 1:39 PM Rob Audenaerde
wrote:
> Hi Mar
The accent should not be on retrieved documents number, but on the duration
ratio - 8.7.0 is 3 times slower. I think it will be similar ratio
retrieving any number of documents.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 1:39 PM Rob Audenaerde
wrote:
> Hi Martrynas,
>
> In your sample code you are retrieving all
Hi Martrynas,
In your sample code you are retrieving all (1 million!) documents from the
index, that surely is not a good match for lucene :)
Is that a good reflection of your use-case?
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 9:52 AM Martynas L wrote:
> Please see the sample at
>
Please see the sample at
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1ufVZXzkugBAFnuy8HLAY6mbPWzjknrfE
IndexGenerator - creates a dummy index.
IndexReader - retrieves documents - duration time with 7.5.0 version is
~2s, while ~6s with 8.7.0
Regards,
Martynas
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 8:21 PM Rob
There is no attachment in the previous email that I can see? Maybe you can
post it online?
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 4:54 PM Martynas L wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Are there any comments on this issue?
> If there is no workaround, we will be forced to rollback to the 7.5.0
> version.
>
> Best regards,
>
Hello,
Are there any comments on this issue?
If there is no workaround, we will be forced to rollback to the 7.5.0
version.
Best regards,
Martynas
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:27 PM Martynas L wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please see attached sample.
> IndexGenerator - creates a dummy index.
> IndexReader -
Hi,
Please see attached sample.
IndexGenerator - creates a dummy index.
IndexReader - retrieves documents - duration time with 7.5.0 version is
~2s, while ~6s with 8.7.0
Regards,
Martynas
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 3:23 PM Vincenzo D'Amore wrote:
> I think it would be useful to have an example
Query is fast, but document retrieval is "slow".
We call:
1) IndexSearcher#search(Query, Collector) to collect docIDs, and then
2) retrieve documents with IndexSearcher#doc(int).
In our case (1) takes less than 0.5s, while (2) almost 1.5 min (4 times
slower than 7.5.0)
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at
I think it would be useful to have an example of a document and, if
possible, an example of query that takes too long.
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 1:47 PM Martynas L wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am sorry for the delay.
>
> Not sure what you mean by "workload". We have a performance tests, which
> started
Hello,
I am sorry for the delay.
Not sure what you mean by "workload". We have a performance tests, which
started failing after upgrading to 8.7.0.
So I just tried to query the index (built form the same source) to get all
documents and compare the performance with 7.5.0.
Document "size" is a
Hello Martynas,
There have indeed been changes related to stored fields in 8.7. What does
your workload look like and how large are your documents on average?
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 3:04 PM Martynas L wrote:
> Hi,
> We've migrated from 7.5.0 to 8.7.0 and find out that the index "searching"
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
