I'm really curious how you expert knows that the present system
"indexes every word properly". You can certainly test any scenario that
can be defined precisely via unit tests as Lance suggests.
Ask for *concrete* examples he's concerned with. Write tests to show that
each
example works. Ask for m
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 03:54 +0100, David Linde wrote:
> Has anyone figured out a way to logically prove that lucene indexes ever
> word properly?
The "Precision and recall in lucene"-thread seems relevant here.
> Our company has done alot of research into lucene, all of our IT department
> is rea
This is what unit tests are for.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 6:57 PM, David Fertig wrote:
> Stop words are never indexed; you may need to empty your stop list.
>
> Luke (open-source w/code available) can browse and re-create documents
> in indexes using their terms already. Compare that to the origin
Stop words are never indexed; you may need to empty your stop list.
Luke (open-source w/code available) can browse and re-create documents
in indexes using their terms already. Compare that to the original to
see if you are satisfied.
-Original Message-
From: David Linde [mailto:davidli
