On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Rob Audenaerde
wrote:
> Ah yes, that is the way to go.
>
> It is a bit harder here, because we also use a per-user InMemoryIndex that
> is combined in a multi-reader, so it will be a bit more work, but I think
> it will be doable. Thanks for all the help.
>
> That
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 6:19 AM, Jürgen Albert
wrote:
> In our case we had open index readers, that
> blocked the index from merging its segments and thus deleting the marked
> segments.
Small correction: merging is never blocked because of open NRT
readers. The merging happens and finishes eve
Ah yes, that is the way to go.
It is a bit harder here, because we also use a per-user InMemoryIndex that
is combined in a multi-reader, so it will be a bit more work, but I think
it will be doable. Thanks for all the help.
That said, I found it not-so-easy to debug this issue; are there methods
Hi Rob,
we use a SearcherManager to obtain a fresh Searcher for every Query.
From the Searcher we get the Reader. After the query you call
searcherManager.release(searcher). The SearcherManager takes care of the
rest.
Regards,
Jürgen.
Am 10.11.2015 um 13:27 schrieb Rob Audenaerde:
Hi Jürg
Hi Jürgen, Michael
Thanks! I seem to be able to reduce the index size by closing and
restarting our application. This reduces the index size from 22G tot 4G,
with is somewhat the expected size. The infoStream also gives me the
'removed unreferenced file (IFD 0 [2015-11-10T12:21:49.293Z; main]: ini
Hi Rob,
we had a similar problem. In our case we had open index readers, that
blocked the index from merging its segments and thus deleting the marked
segments.
Regards,
Jürgen.
Am 06.11.2015 um 08:59 schrieb Rob Audenaerde:
Hi will, others
Thanks for you reply,
As far as I understand it
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
It's also important to IndexWriter.commit (as well as open new NRT
> readers) periodically or after doing a large set of updates, as that
> lets Lucene remove any old segments referenced by the prior commit
> p
Thanks Mike for the reply,
I already commit every after every 5000 documents per Thread.
I also found out today how to enable the InfoStream through the
IndexWriterConfig, so I'll have lots of extra information to work on. Will
run it on the production environment to find out what's happening the
It's also important to IndexWriter.commit (as well as open new NRT
readers) periodically or after doing a large set of updates, as that
lets Lucene remove any old segments referenced by the prior commit
point.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 2:59 AM, Rob Au
Hi will, others
Thanks for you reply,
As far as I understand it, deleting a document is just setting the deleted
bit, and when segments are merged, then the documents are removed. (not
really sure what this means exactly; I guess the document gets removed from
the store, the terms will no longer
Hi Rob:
Do you understand how deletes work and how an index is compacted?
There's some configuration/runtime activities you don't mention And
you make testing process sound like a mirror of production? (Including
configuration?)
-will
On 11/5/15 7:33 AM, Rob Audenaerde wrote:
Hi all,
11 matches
Mail list logo