Yonik Seeley wrote:
I think it would be 2 billion. There are many places that woudn't
like the overflow to negative docids I think...
We have indexes up to 200M documents, so 1/10th the max.
64 bit ids are definitely something to think about for the near future.
Until/unless Java grows 64 bit
I think it would be 2 billion. There are many places that woudn't
like the overflow to negative docids I think...
We have indexes up to 200M documents, so 1/10th the max.
64 bit ids are definitely something to think about for the near future.
> Who's got Lucene indexes nearing the maximum intege
On Aug 10, 2005, at 6:47 PM, Chris Fraschetti wrote:
maybe this is a stupid question, maybe not...
hits.id returns an int.. which would lead me to assume the obvious
limitations of the size of the index (size meaning number of docs) ...
assuming I reach this limit, can I expect lucene to throw s
