Hi,
Thanks for your fix. I used it but I think there is something wrong with the
fix!!? because
I am using LATimes collection and with epsilon = 0.1 and k =10 I got 97%
pruned index. It means 3% of index left unchanged after pruning. In the the
original paper, "Static index pruning for IR systems
Hi Zeynep,
I was facing the same issue in CarmelUniformTermPruningPolicy in
package org.apache.lucene.index.pruning .
I think the issue is in the while loop condition in following peice of code
*while ((docsPos < (docs.length - 1))*
* && termPositions.doc() > docs[docsPos].doc) {*
* docsPos++;*
Thanks for the link. I reviewed it.
Here are more details about the exception:
I used contrib/benchmark/conf/wikipedia.alg to index wikipedia dump with
MAddDocs: 20. I wanted to index only a specific period of time so I
added an if statement in doLogic of AddDocTask class.
I tried to prune t
Not unless you provide a lot more context, there's
nothing to go on here!
You might review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
Best
Erick
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:11 AM, Zeynep P. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the pruning package, pruneAllPositions throws an exception. In the code
> it is comm