Re: Re[2]: Frequently updated fields

2008-09-16 Thread Jason Rutherglen
Hi Wojciech, The code isn't ready, it is a major project and I am trying to also complete the realtime indexing patches and look for a job. I believe that the tag indexing stuff is of interest to many people so if there is someone who can pay to get it completed feel free to contact me as I am av

Re[2]: Frequently updated fields

2008-09-16 Thread Wojciech Strzałka
I saw your comments on JIRA. You mentioned about rework and I'm wondering if the currently available patch is production ready (functionally complete)? Will the code after rework work with the index build with the current version? I'm quite new to SOLR/Lucene but I hope I could write custom

Re[2]: Frequently updated fields

2008-09-13 Thread Wojciech Strzałka
My strong reqirement is that search server runs on different machine then client - so I think I have two options: SOLR or Lucene via RMI (RemoteSearchable) So by now it looks like I have several options: 1. TagIndex - like described here http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/

Re: Re[2]: Frequently updated fields

2008-09-12 Thread Erick Erickson
If you search the archive, this very topic has been discussed many times. You'e find a wealth of discussion and more than a few options outlined there Best Erick 2008/9/12 Wojciech Strzałka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The most changing fields will be I think: > Status (read/unread): in fact I'm af

Re[2]: Frequently updated fields

2008-09-12 Thread Wojciech Strzałka
The most changing fields will be I think: Status (read/unread): in fact I'm affraid of this at most - any mail incoming to the system will need to be indexed at least twice Flags: 0..n values from enum Tags:0..n values from enum Of course all the other field

Re[2]: Frequently updated fields

2008-09-12 Thread Wojciech Strzałka
Thanks for reply. Generally good idea and I like it - almost :) We just need to tweak it a little more. What if I have to search for both fields at the same time? Is there any way to do something similiar to SQL JOIN on the two documents / indexes? (I don't think so) I think ca