SV: SV: Sort problematics

2006-05-18 Thread Marcus Falck
Hi Gunther. We thought in the terms of an index containing the search profiles and search that index using the documents as a query. But we couldn't really figure it out. We have an alert service up and running today using Veritys implementation of alerts. So we looked at the Verity documentat

SV: SV: Sort problematics

2006-05-18 Thread Marcus Falck
Well that book is cool =) Från: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: to 2006-05-18 22:56 Till: java-user@lucene.apache.org Ämne: Re: SV: Sort problematics On May 18, 2006, at 4:25 PM, Marcus Falck wrote: > Where can i read more about the lucene so

SV: SV: SV: SV: SV: Sort problematics

2006-05-18 Thread Marcus Falck
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: to 2006-05-18 20:09 Till: java-user@lucene.apache.org Ämne: Re: SV: SV: SV: SV: Sort problematics On May 18, 2006, at 11:33 AM, Marcus Falck wrote: > But it will still require A LOT of RAM just to cache! Well, the more RAM you have the better when it comes

Re: SV: SV: SV: SV: Sort problematics

2006-05-18 Thread Erik Hatcher
On May 18, 2006, at 11:33 AM, Marcus Falck wrote: But it will still require A LOT of RAM just to cache! Well, the more RAM you have the better when it comes to Solr responsiveness, I'm sure. But, Solr leverages some caching cleverness so the queries and filters used most frequently are in

SV: SV: SV: SV: Sort problematics

2006-05-18 Thread Marcus Falck
But it will still require A LOT of RAM just to cache! -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Yonik Seeley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: den 18 maj 2006 17:24 Till: java-user@lucene.apache.org Ämne: Re: SV: SV: SV: Sort problematics On 5/18/06, Marcus Falck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: SV: SV: SV: Sort problematics

2006-05-18 Thread Yonik Seeley
On 5/18/06, Marcus Falck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Doesn't solr use the same sort implementation as Lucene ? Yes, but Solr handles the mechanics of warming up a new searcher in the background to avoid those lengthy first-time hits to the FieldCache and norms, and it warms any configured caches

SV: SV: SV: SV: Sort problematics

2006-05-18 Thread Marcus Falck
Doesn't solr use the same sort implementation as Lucene ? -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: den 18 maj 2006 14:57 Till: java-user@lucene.apache.org Ämne: Re: SV: SV: SV: Sort problematics On May 18, 2006, at 7:04 AM, Marcus Falck

Re: SV: SV: SV: Sort problematics

2006-05-18 Thread Erik Hatcher
: Re: SV: SV: Sort problematics On May 18, 2006, at 6:41 AM, Marcus Falck wrote: Yes Erik I'm instantiating a new IndexSearcher for every search. Then don't :) You only need a new IndexSearcher instance when the index itself has changed. -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Er

SV: SV: SV: Sort problematics

2006-05-18 Thread Marcus Falck
Yes I know. But the index is changed constantly. / Marcus -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: den 18 maj 2006 12:52 Till: java-user@lucene.apache.org Ämne: Re: SV: SV: Sort problematics On May 18, 2006, at 6:41 AM, Marcus Falck wrote: >

Re: SV: SV: Sort problematics

2006-05-18 Thread Erik Hatcher
On May 18, 2006, at 6:41 AM, Marcus Falck wrote: Yes Erik I'm instantiating a new IndexSearcher for every search. Then don't :) You only need a new IndexSearcher instance when the index itself has changed. -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

SV: SV: Sort problematics

2006-05-18 Thread Marcus Falck
Yes Erik I'm instantiating a new IndexSearcher for every search. -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: den 18 maj 2006 12:08 Till: java-user@lucene.apache.org Ämne: Re: SV: Sort problematics On May 18, 2006, at 4:52 AM, Marcus Falck wrote: > I