; Now that the QueryParser knows about position increments has anyone
> > used this to do stemming at query time and not at indexing time? I
> > suppose one would need a reverse stemmer. Given the query breath it
> > would need to inject breathe, breathes, breathing etc.
>
On Monday 30 May 2005 18:54, Andrew Boyd wrote:
> Now that the QueryParser knows about position increments has anyone
> used this to do stemming at query time and not at indexing time? I
> suppose one would need a reverse stemmer. Given the query breath it
> would need to in
the QueryParser knows about position increments has anyone
used this to do stemming at query time
and not at indexing time? I suppose one would need a reverse stemmer.
Given the query breath it would need to inject breathe, breathes,
breathing etc.
One benifit is that if you ever wanted to chang
Hi All,
Now that the QueryParser knows about position increments has anyone used this
to do stemming at query time
and not at indexing time? I suppose one would need a reverse stemmer. Given
the query breath it would need to inject breathe, breathes, breathing etc.
One benifit is that if
