ShingleFilter in Lucene 4.6
either remove the shingleanalyzer or the additional filter...
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Natalia Connolly
wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
>No, I did not… I just needed the filter to stop it from outputting
> unigrams; otherwise I was getting "This",
either remove the shingleanalyzer or the additional filter...
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Natalia Connolly
wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
>No, I did not… I just needed the filter to stop it from outputting
> unigrams; otherwise I was getting "This", "this is", "is", "is a ", and so
> on. Is ther
Did you really mean to shingle twice (shingleanalyzerwrapper just
wraps the analyzer with a shinglefilter, then the code wraps that with
another shinglefilter again) ?
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Natalia Connolly
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>I am very confused about what ShingleFilter seems to be d
Hi Robert,
No, I did not… I just needed the filter to stop it from outputting
unigrams; otherwise I was getting "This", "this is", "is", "is a ", and so
on. Is there another way I could do it?
Thank you,
Natalia
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> Did you really
Hello,
I am very confused about what ShingleFilter seems to be doing in Lucene
4.6. What I would like to do is extract all possible bigrams from a
sentence. So if the sentence is "This is a dog", I want "This is", "is a
", "a dog".
Here is my code:
StringTokenizer itr = new StringTok
