> Regards
> Rajib
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Saha, Rajib
> Sent: 27 May 2025 11:52
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Suggestion needed for a case of Lucene Migration with TokenStream
>
> Hi Uwe,
>
> Thanks for your suggestions till now. We have be
eneIndexEngine.merge(LuceneIndexEngine.java:981)
=
Regards
Rajib
-Original Message-
From: Uwe Schindler
Sent: 30 April 2025 02:03
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Suggestion needed for a case of Lucene Migration with TokenStream
If
IndexEngine.java:981)
=
Regards
Rajib
-Original Message-
From: Uwe Schindler
Sent: 30 April 2025 02:03
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Suggestion needed for a case of Lucene Migration with TokenStream
If this is Windows, the deletion may not wor
:59
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Suggestion needed for a case of Lucene Migration with TokenStream
Hi,
what do you mean with: "But same content on rebuilding the index is not
working"?
How do you rebuild the index? It is not enough to just read all
documents as stored
Schindler
Sent: 28 April 2025 17:59
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Suggestion needed for a case of Lucene Migration with TokenStream
Hi,
what do you mean with: "But same content on rebuilding the index is not
working"?
How do you rebuild the index? It is not enough to jus
art now.
Do you have any suggestion on the problem ?
Regards
Rajib
-Original Message-
From: Uwe Schindler
Sent: 25 April 2025 18:19
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Suggestion needed for a case of Lucene Migration with TokenStream
Hi,
I'd like to mention the following: Yo
.
I am debugging this part now.
Do you have any suggestion on the problem ?
Regards
Rajib
-Original Message-
From: Uwe Schindler
Sent: 25 April 2025 18:19
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Suggestion needed for a case of Lucene Migration with TokenStream
Hi,
I'd li
5)
=
Can you please suggest here too?
Regards
Rajib
-Original Message-
From: Mikhail Khludnev
Sent: 24 April 2025 12:10
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Suggestion needed for a case of Lucene Migration with
TokenStream
Hi
Use TextField.TYPE_STORED as the third ar
ludnev
> Sent: 24 April 2025 12:10
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Suggestion needed for a case of Lucene Migration with
> TokenStream
>
> Hi
> Use TextField.TYPE_STORED as the third argument in new Field()
> see
>
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blo
)
=
Can you please suggest here too?
Regards
Rajib
-Original Message-
From: Mikhail Khludnev
Sent: 24 April 2025 12:10
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Suggestion needed for a case of Lucene Migration with TokenStream
Hi
Use TextField.TYPE_STORED as the third
Hi
Use TextField.TYPE_STORED as the third argument in new Field()
see
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/e27f44e3d78dfcec230c97e0a1240e3751daeff9/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/document/TextField.java#L35C33-L35C44
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 8:37 AM Saha, Rajib
wrote:
> Hi Experts,
Hi Experts,
We are migrating Lucene from 2.4.1 to 8.11.2.
During Migration for a part of code, we are getting below exception in 8.11.2
based changes from Red line colored.
=
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: TokenStream fields must be indexed and
tokenized
at org.apache.lucene.do
12 matches
Mail list logo
