Grant Ingersoll-6 wrote:
>
> I presume they are both now slower, right? Otherwise you wouldn't
> mind the speedup on the bigger one. Hits did caching and prefetched
> things, which has it's tradeoffs. Can you describe how you were
> measuring the queries? How many results were you get
I presume they are both now slower, right? Otherwise you wouldn't
mind the speedup on the bigger one. Hits did caching and prefetched
things, which has it's tradeoffs. Can you describe how you were
measuring the queries? How many results were you getting?
-Grant
On Feb 3, 2009, at 8:
Hello,
I was using lucene 2.3.2 with hits and switch to lucene 2.4.0 and now I am
using TopDocCollector.
I have two queries which are running against the same index.
One query is returning 80bytes information other one is returning 2000bytes
With old Hits the query which was returning smaller d
