The Jesuit mind is always justifying itself and trying to seem like there is
popularity and hype around there ultimate disgraceful mislead.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 23, 2023, at 2:26 PM, Cody Amen wrote:
>
> Hey man dont advertise or opinion. Lucene is just fine the way it is. Your
> jus
Hey man dont advertise or opinion. Lucene is just fine the way it is. Your just
idolating some Jesuit opinion to try and hurt people and disinformation.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 23, 2023, at 2:25 PM, Cody Amen wrote:
>
> As oppossed to like i want to find everything less than < 6.00
>
>
As oppossed to like i want to find everything less than < 6.00
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 20, 2023, at 7:05 AM, Michael Wechner
> wrote:
>
> Hi Adrien
>
> Thank you very much for your feedback as well!
>
> I just replaced the StringField by KeywordField :-)
>
> Thanks
>
> Michael
>
>>
Yo, a facet can be booleon or coordinate or currency,,, so maybe all your
facets are the currency and then your fields would be an integer. And then you
could say... i just want yen, or pesos or whatever
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 20, 2023, at 7:05 AM, Michael Wechner
> wrote:
>
> Hi Adri
Hi Greg
Thank you very much for your additional information, really very much
appreciated!
Yes, generally speaking I think Lucene has many great features, which
unfortunately are not so obvious for various reasons.
Documentation could of course always be better, but I guess it is also
beca
Not all of your fields might be strings
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 23, 2023, at 1:10 PM, Greg Miller wrote:
>
> Hey Michael-
>
> You've gotten a lot of great information here already. I'll point you to
> one more implementation as well: StringValueFacetCounts. This
> implementation lets you
Hey Michael-
You've gotten a lot of great information here already. I'll point you to
one more implementation as well: StringValueFacetCounts. This
implementation lets you do faceting over arbitrary "string-like" doc value
fields (SORTED and SORTED_SET). So if you already have a field of this type
thanks very much for this additional information, Marc!
Am 20.10.23 um 20:30 schrieb Marc D'Mello:
Just following up on Mike's comment:
It used to be that the "doc values" based faceting did not support
arbitrary hierarchy, but I think that was fixed at some point.
Yeah it was fixed a yea
Just following up on Mike's comment:
> It used to be that the "doc values" based faceting did not support
>
arbitrary hierarchy, but I think that was fixed at some point.
Yeah it was fixed a year or two ago, SortedSetDocValuesFacetField supports
hierarchical faceting, I think you just need to e
cool, thank you very much!
Michael
Am 20.10.23 um 15:44 schrieb Michael McCandless:
You can use either the "doc values" implementation for facets
(SortedSetDocValuesFacetField), or the "taxonomy" implementation
(FacetField, in which case, yes, you need to create a TaxonomyWriter).
It used to
You can use either the "doc values" implementation for facets
(SortedSetDocValuesFacetField), or the "taxonomy" implementation
(FacetField, in which case, yes, you need to create a TaxonomyWriter).
It used to be that the "doc values" based faceting did not support
arbitrary hierarchy, but I think
Hi Adrien
Thank you very much for your feedback as well!
I just replaced the StringField by KeywordField :-)
Thanks
Michael
Am 20.10.23 um 14:13 schrieb Adrien Grand:
FYI there is also KeywordField, which combines StringField and
SortedSetDocValuesField. It supports filtering, sorting, facet
Hi Mike
Thanks for your feedback!
IIUC in order to have the actual advantages of Facets one has to
"connect" it with a TaxonomyWriter
FacetsConfig config = new FacetsConfig();
DirectoryTaxonomyWriter taxoWriter = new DirectoryTaxonomyWriter(taxoDir);
indexWriter.addDocument(config.build(taxoW
FYI there is also KeywordField, which combines StringField and
SortedSetDocValuesField. It supports filtering, sorting, faceting and
retrieval. It's my go-to field for string values.
Le ven. 20 oct. 2023, 12:20, Michael McCandless
a écrit :
> There are some differences.
>
> StringField is indexe
There are some differences.
StringField is indexed into the inverted index (postings) so you can do
efficient filtering. You can also store in stored fields to retrieve.
FacetField does everything StringField does (filtering, storing (maybe?)),
but in addition it stores data for faceting. I.e.
Hi
I have found the following simple Facet Example
https://github.com/apache/lucene/blob/main/lucene/demo/src/java/org/apache/lucene/demo/facet/SimpleFacetsExample.java
whereas for a simple categorization of documents I currently use
StringField, e.g.
doc1.add(new StringField("category", "bo
16 matches
Mail list logo
