Re: Wild Card Query Performance

2013-03-29 Thread Arun Kumar K
while indexing > and just search for "ab"? This is very fast! This also applies to Lucene > 3.x! > > Uwe > > - > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: [email protected] > > > > -Original Message

RE: Wild Card Query Performance

2013-03-29 Thread Uwe Schindler
- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: [email protected] > -Original Message- > From: Arun Kumar K [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 11:13 AM > To: java-user > Subject: Re: Wild Card Query Perform

Re: Wild Card Query Performance

2013-03-29 Thread Arun Kumar K
dler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: [email protected] > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Arun Kumar K [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 10:38 AM > > To: java-user > > Subject: Wi

RE: Wild Card Query Performance

2013-03-29 Thread Uwe Schindler
constructs, if they limit more than just prefix. Uwe - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: [email protected] > -Original Message- > From: Arun Kumar K [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 10:38 AM > To: java

Wild Card Query Performance

2013-03-29 Thread Arun Kumar K
Hi Guys, I have been testing the search time improvement in Lucene 4.0 from Lucene 3.0.2 version for Wildcard Queries (with atleast say 2 chars Eg.ar*). For a 2GB size index with 400 docs, the following observations were made: Around 3X improvement with and without STRING sort on a sortable