Hi,
Thanks for the thoughts. I agree a combinatorial explosion of fields and index
size would “solve” the problem but the cost is rather absurd. Hence, I posed
the problem to prompt some discussion about what a plausible/reasonable
solution might be.
It has seemed to be for some time that ther
I think you can achieve what you are asking by having a field for every
possible combination of pairs of input and output. Obviously this would
explode the size of your index, so it's not ideal.
Another alternative would be indexing all variants into a single field,
using different analyzers for d
Hello,
I’m working on a project where it would be most helpful for
getWrappedAnalyzer() in an extension to DelegatingAnalyzerWrapper to have
access to more than just the fieldName.
The scenario is that we are working with several languages: Tibetan, Sanskrit
and Chinese; that each have several
