Hi Nico,
On 08/05/2008 at 9:44 AM, Nico Krijnen wrote:
> On 5 aug 2008, at 11:11, Karsten F. wrote:
> > Can't you store only the relevant path in an extra lucene
> > field and set the maximum of query-terms to e.g. 2048 ?
>
> @Karsten: We did think about simplifying permissions to just top-level
>
Thanks for the replies,
We'll try the filters then, possibly with cache if required for
performance.
@Karsten: We did think about simplifying permissions to just top-level
folders, which is probably suitable for 80% of our clients. If the
filter is too slow we may have to. In that case it
This situation is pretty much the kind of thing PrefixFilters
were written for, so I'd certainly try those first, with or
without caching. I was surprised at how fast filters
get constructed, so I'd just try it and take a few measurements.
Best
Erick
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 3:40 AM, Nico Krijnen <
> may have some more experience with queries like this or may have a
> better suggestion on how to approach this?
>
> Kind regards,
> Nico Krijnen
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/folder-path-prefix-filtering-tp18826094p18827325.html
Sent from the Lu
Hello,
Need some help with prefix filtering...
We ran into the max clause count problem with our usage of the
wildcard query. Essentially what we are trying to do is:
One of the fields in our index contains a 'path' representing a file
system location. For example:
/folder A/subfolder/doc
