Cheers Michael.
On 10/03/07, Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Dino Korah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand lucene has a requirement of double the size of index
> available
> free on the disk on which the index is being optimised. But if in case
> the
> disk gets filled u
"Dino Korah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand lucene has a requirement of double the size of index
> available
> free on the disk on which the index is being optimised. But if in case
> the
> disk gets filled up during optimisation, what will happen to the index,
> theoretically? Is there
Hi All,
I understand lucene has a requirement of double the size of index available
free on the disk on which the index is being optimised. But if in case the
disk gets filled up during optimisation, what will happen to the index,
theoretically? Is there an effective way of avoiding this?
Many T
