I believe so. Java's synchronized' keyword is what makes it possible to
use multiple threads with a single IndexWriter instance, and I believe
that means threads are processed in a FIFO manner.
Otis
--- Chris Fraschetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If i'm using multiple threads to add documents
If i'm using multiple threads to add documents to the index, can it be
assumed that they will be added to the index in the order they are
presented to the indexwriter? and thus keeping my local doc id count
would hold true?
-Chris Fraschetti
On 7/29/05, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On Jul 29, 2005, at 4:40 PM, Chris Fraschetti wrote:
I've got an index which I rebuild each time and don't do any deletes
until the end, so doc ids shouldn't change... at index time, is there
a better way to discover the id of the document i just added than
docCount() ?
When building a new ind
I've got an index which I rebuild each time and don't do any deletes
until the end, so doc ids shouldn't change... at index time, is there
a better way to discover the id of the document i just added than
docCount() ?
--
___
Chris Fraschetti
e [EMAIL
