[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 01 October 2007 14:35
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: mixing analyzer
>
> Sure, but there's a time/space tradeoff. Isn't there always
>
> PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper is your friend. It would require that your
> index
.
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 October 2007 14:35
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: mixing analyzer
Sure, but there's a time/space tradeoff. Isn't there always
PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper is your friend. It would require that
Sure, but there's a time/space tradeoff. Isn't there always
PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper is your friend. It would require that your
index be built on a per-language basis. Say indexing
text from French documents in a field "french_text", Chinese
documents in a field chinese_text. You'd construct y
Hi,
I am working on a lucene email indexing system which potentially can get
documents in various languages. Currently I am using StandardAnalyzer, which
works for English but not for many of the other languages. One of the
requirements for the search interface is that they have to search witho