Re: question about using lucene on large documents

wrote: Thanks, gives me food for thought. So no { N, N+1 } ideas specifically... -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/question-about-using-lucene-on-large-documents-tp4115343p4115465.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabbl

Re: question about using lucene on large documents

Thanks, gives me food for thought. So no { N, N+1 } ideas specifically... -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/question-about-using-lucene-on-large-documents-tp4115343p4115465.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: question about using lucene on large documents

oth Documents, as a pair, should then be given a ranking, as a pair of Documents. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/question-about-using-lucene-on-large-documents-tp4115343.html Sent from the Lucene - Java

question about using lucene on large documents

ts. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/question-about-using-lucene-on-large-documents-tp4115343.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail