Chris Hostetter wrote:
THe only usefull callback/listner abstractions i can think of are when you
want to know if someone has finished with a set of changes -- wether that
change is adding one document, deleting one document, or adding/deleting a
whole bunch of documents isn't really relevent, yo
Hi Lucene-users,
is it possible not only to get the document which contains the words of
a query, but also get the position in the text of the query word?
Franz
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comma
Hi,
does anyone know an up to date integration of Lucene into JBoss.
ejIndex - JBoss MBean for Lucene seems to be out of date.
Thanks!
Stefan and Peter
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-ma
Hi Scott,
I saw your email and thought of some work I have been doing recently for
matching text on the fly. If you are not going to be keeping the emails for
later searching then this may provide a faster and easier way of checking
your email. It involves using monq which is a java api -
h
Hi every body:
I need to know how to merge an index into another.
I have a master index whose another indexes are added to it from others
nodes . I want to merge indexes from the
others nodes to master index, I made this method:
public void merge(String MasterIndexDir, String IndexTo
On Montag 15 Mai 2006 19:51, Ariel Isaac Romero wrote:
> IndexReader indexToMerge =
> IndexReader.open(IndexToMerge); AnalyzerHandler analyzer = new
> AnalyzerHandler(); IndexWriter fsWriter = new IndexWriter(fsDir,
> analyzer.getAnalyzer(), false);
Don't open a reader, supply an
On Montag 15 Mai 2006 14:54, Franz Coriand wrote:
> is it possible not only to get the document which contains the words of
> a query, but also get the position in the text of the query word?
Yes, by using the term vectors with positions that were added in Lucene 1.9
(see class Field.TermVector)
I think that do not solve my problem, because the line who's throwing the
exception is this :
IndexWriter fsWriter = new IndexWriter(fsDir, analyzer.getAnalyzer(),
false);
Besides if I create a new master index each time I'm going to merge them
I'd lose others indexes I have merged into master i
On Montag 15 Mai 2006 21:09, Ariel Isaac Romero wrote:
> I'd lose others indexes I have merged into master index before, that's
> why I can't put the boolean parameter true.
Use the "true" parameter to create a *new* index, not to overwrite an
existing one.
Regards
Daniel
--
http://www.danie
Daniel Naber danielnaber.de> writes:
> On Montag 15 Mai 2006 14:54, Franz Coriand wrote:
> > is it possible not only to get the document which contains the words of
> > a query, but also get the position in the text of the query word?
>
> Yes, by using the term vectors with positions that were ad
On Montag 15 Mai 2006 21:34, Arturo Perez wrote:
> Does this mean that the Highlighter needs to be redone to take advantage
> of this? Or has the highlighter already been updated?
No, it has not been updated yet.
Regards
Daniel
--
http://www.danielnaber.de
--
Greets,
If you needed to know not just the total number of hits, but the
number of hits in each "category", how would you handle that?
For instance, a search for "egg" would have to produce the 20 most
relevant documents for "egg", but also a list like this:
Holiday & Seasonal / Easte
Marvin Humphrey wrote:
Greets,
If you needed to know not just the total number of hits, but the
number of hits in each "category", how would you handle that?
For instance, a search for "egg" would have to produce the 20 most
relevant documents for "egg", but also a list like this:
Holi
On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 06:35 +0200, karl wettin wrote:
> Perhaps I can find a way to select notification strategy using
> the same listener interface.
I mostly look for the Solr-kind-of-solution for now, but I will
absolutely keep my mind set on that the layer should allow hooks deep in
the code.
On May 15, 2006, at 5:07 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
If you needed to know not just the total number of hits, but the
number of hits in each "category", how would you handle that?
For instance, a search for "egg" would have to produce the 20 most
relevant documents for "egg", but also a list
Even I am doing the same in my application.
Once in a day, all the filters [for different categories] are
initialized. Each time a query is fired, the Query BitSet is ANDed with
the BitSet of each filter. The cardinality obtained is the desired output.
@Eric: I would like to know more about the
16 matches
Mail list logo
