Your "to" field on the email makes me wonder if you are using .NET or
Java...
On Sep 7, 2007, at 8:40 AM, Laxmilal Menaria wrote:
Hello everyone,
I have indexed a mysql database using Lucene2.0. It was taking less
than 2
minutes for 14000 records. Then I indexed the same data using
Lucen
On Sep 7, 2007, at 4:02 AM, Sonu SR wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to distinct adjacent words between lines. I have
problem
while searching a phrase. Since I am using stopword analyzer, the
newlines
starting with stopwords are ignored in phrase search. So, such
documents
comes as search result
Hello everyone,
I have indexed a mysql database using Lucene2.0. It was taking less than 2
minutes for 14000 records. Then I indexed the same data using Lucene2.2. It
took about 4 minutes. I got affected indexing speed on using Lucene2.2. The
indexing code is same. I just updated the lucenejar.
W
I just added brief mentions of some upcoming Lucene/Solr-related
events to this page:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/OnTheRoad
Below is some self-promotion of an upcoming class I have agreed to
teach. It's uncomfortable to send this sort of thing out, but if I
don't then you might n
Is it repeatable? Maybe the database is slower during that time.
Myself didn't any major slowness when upgrading to Lucene 2.2.
--
Chris Lu
-
Instant Scalable Full-Text Search On Any Database/Application
site: http://www.dbsight.net
demo: http://search.dbsight.com
Lucene
Hi
We are still getting various issues on our Lucene indexes running on an NFS
share. It has taken me some time to find some useful information to report
to the mailing list.
I have created a test application which is running on two Linux servers.
The Lucene index is on an NFS share. After ru
>
> "pkimber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > We are still getting various issues on our Lucene indexes running on
> > an NFS share. It has taken me some time to find some useful
> > information to report to the mailing list.
>
> Bummer!
>
> Can you zip up your test application that shows the iss
"pkimber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are still getting various issues on our Lucene indexes running on
> an NFS share. It has taken me some time to find some useful
> information to report to the mailing list.
Bummer!
Can you zip up your test application that shows the issue, as well as
t
Hi,
Is there a way to distinct adjacent words between lines. I have problem
while searching a phrase. Since I am using stopword analyzer, the newlines
starting with stopwords are ignored in phrase search. So, such documents
comes as search result.
Please help me to solve this issue.
Thanks,
Sonu
"Patrick Kimber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I cannot send you the source code without speaking to my manager
> first. I guess he would want me to change the code before sending it
> to you. You could have the log files now, but I expect you want to
> wait until the test application is ready t
Have tested both Java Lucene 2.0 and Lucene.Net 2.0, but now
Lucene.Net 2.1in development.
On 9/7/07, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Your "to" field on the email makes me wonder if you are using .NET or
> Java...
>
> On Sep 7, 2007, at 8:40 AM, Laxmilal Menaria wrote:
>
> > Hello e
I have just commented the Index writer method and check the performance, it
shows me appx 10 sec. to process all rows. and againg uncommented that its
show 4 minutes.
On 9/7/07, Chris Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is it repeatable? Maybe the database is slower during that time.
>
> Myself didn
12 matches
Mail list logo