Re: Indexing Speed using Lucene 2.2

2007-09-07 Thread Grant Ingersoll
Your "to" field on the email makes me wonder if you are using .NET or Java... On Sep 7, 2007, at 8:40 AM, Laxmilal Menaria wrote: Hello everyone, I have indexed a mysql database using Lucene2.0. It was taking less than 2 minutes for 14000 records. Then I indexed the same data using Lucen

Re: How to distinct phrase matches between lines

2007-09-07 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Sep 7, 2007, at 4:02 AM, Sonu SR wrote: Hi, Is there a way to distinct adjacent words between lines. I have problem while searching a phrase. Since I am using stopword analyzer, the newlines starting with stopwords are ignored in phrase search. So, such documents comes as search result

Indexing Speed using Lucene 2.2

2007-09-07 Thread Laxmilal Menaria
Hello everyone, I have indexed a mysql database using Lucene2.0. It was taking less than 2 minutes for 14000 records. Then I indexed the same data using Lucene2.2. It took about 4 minutes. I got affected indexing speed on using Lucene2.2. The indexing code is same. I just updated the lucenejar. W

Lucene/Solr "OnTheRoad"

2007-09-07 Thread Erik Hatcher
I just added brief mentions of some upcoming Lucene/Solr-related events to this page: http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/OnTheRoad Below is some self-promotion of an upcoming class I have agreed to teach. It's uncomfortable to send this sort of thing out, but if I don't then you might n

Re: Indexing Speed using Lucene 2.2

2007-09-07 Thread Chris Lu
Is it repeatable? Maybe the database is slower during that time. Myself didn't any major slowness when upgrading to Lucene 2.2. -- Chris Lu - Instant Scalable Full-Text Search On Any Database/Application site: http://www.dbsight.net demo: http://search.dbsight.com Lucene

Re: Lucene 2.2, NFS, Lock obtain timed out

2007-09-07 Thread pkimber
Hi We are still getting various issues on our Lucene indexes running on an NFS share. It has taken me some time to find some useful information to report to the mailing list. I have created a test application which is running on two Linux servers. The Lucene index is on an NFS share. After ru

Re: Lucene 2.2, NFS, Lock obtain timed out

2007-09-07 Thread Patrick Kimber
> > "pkimber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > We are still getting various issues on our Lucene indexes running on > > an NFS share. It has taken me some time to find some useful > > information to report to the mailing list. > > Bummer! > > Can you zip up your test application that shows the iss

Re: Lucene 2.2, NFS, Lock obtain timed out

2007-09-07 Thread Michael McCandless
"pkimber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We are still getting various issues on our Lucene indexes running on > an NFS share. It has taken me some time to find some useful > information to report to the mailing list. Bummer! Can you zip up your test application that shows the issue, as well as t

How to distinct phrase matches between lines

2007-09-07 Thread Sonu SR
Hi, Is there a way to distinct adjacent words between lines. I have problem while searching a phrase. Since I am using stopword analyzer, the newlines starting with stopwords are ignored in phrase search. So, such documents comes as search result. Please help me to solve this issue. Thanks, Sonu

Re: Lucene 2.2, NFS, Lock obtain timed out

2007-09-07 Thread Michael McCandless
"Patrick Kimber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I cannot send you the source code without speaking to my manager > first. I guess he would want me to change the code before sending it > to you. You could have the log files now, but I expect you want to > wait until the test application is ready t

Re: Indexing Speed using Lucene 2.2

2007-09-07 Thread Laxmilal Menaria
Have tested both Java Lucene 2.0 and Lucene.Net 2.0, but now Lucene.Net 2.1in development. On 9/7/07, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Your "to" field on the email makes me wonder if you are using .NET or > Java... > > On Sep 7, 2007, at 8:40 AM, Laxmilal Menaria wrote: > > > Hello e

Re: Indexing Speed using Lucene 2.2

2007-09-07 Thread Laxmilal Menaria
I have just commented the Index writer method and check the performance, it shows me appx 10 sec. to process all rows. and againg uncommented that its show 4 minutes. On 9/7/07, Chris Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is it repeatable? Maybe the database is slower during that time. > > Myself didn