Is it possible to write a document with different analyzers in different fields?
PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
We stuck a 60 GB OCZ "Core Series" SSD in a Dell T5400 (dual quadcore,
16GB RAM, SATA II 7200 RPM disk) and did some comparisons between
running with our index on disk, vs. on SSD. I can't really talk about
what the app does, but I can share the difference in performance; see
enclose
Eric Bowman wrote:
Hi all,
We stuck a 60 GB OCZ "Core Series" SSD in a Dell T5400 (dual quadcore,
16GB RAM, SATA II 7200 RPM disk) and did some comparisons between
running with our index on disk, vs. on SSD. I can't really talk about
what the app does, but I can share the difference in perfo
Hi all,
Well this is my first post on this list. Nice to meet you all.
Im currently putting in place a system which index data with Apache
Lucene (indexing doc, xls, pdf, source code, zip files, ...) and allow
searching with the Zend Lucene Search library (PHP). Im planning to
create a fro
I'd be curious how much of a performance difference you see between
the different SSD drives.
This test was with OCZ "Core Series" but previous tests were with
different SSDs right?
EG Intel just released a new 80 GB SSD (X25-M) which is getting rave
reviews, even compared to the OCZ "c
Michael McCandless wrote:
I'd be curious how much of a performance difference you see between
the different SSD drives.
This test was with OCZ "Core Series" but previous tests were with
different SSDs right?
EG Intel just released a new 80 GB SSD (X25-M) which is getting rave
reviews, eve
Bonjour Romain,
Im asking myself a few questions. Mainly about speed (indexation time) and
> document parsing (way to index most of commonly used office documents). For
> document parsing, I'm planning to use different open sources library. The
> company Im doing this for will be indexing a few
Related, I've been considering filesystem based filters on SSD. That
ought to be rather fast, consume no memory and be as simple as a
RandomAccessFile. I didn't spend to much time on it, gave up when I
couldn't figure out when it made sense to close the file. Perhaps it
would be nice with a
I saw your comments on JIRA. You mentioned about rework and I'm wondering if
the currently
available patch is production ready (functionally complete)?
Will the code after rework work with the index build with the current
version?
I'm quite new to SOLR/Lucene but I hope I could write custom
Hi there,
I am using WhiteSpaceAnalyser to index documents. I have used this because i
need to split tokens based on space only. Also Tokensized=true
While indexing what does it do with special characters like + - && || ! ( )
{ } [ ] ^ " ~ * ? : \, will these characters be indexed or will be chopp
Hi!
I'm writing application that should be using lucene for searching threw
~200 documents.
Search criterias i'm collecting using BooleanQuery and ChainedFilter.
Avarage search takes 150 ms, what is acceptable in my case.
But i should have hits count for ~20 more variants of search criteria
You can easily answer the questions about what WhitespaceTokenizer
produces by getting a copy of Luke and looking at your index. Or writing
a really simple test program that prints out tokens.
At the bottom of this page is a list of special characters for escaping:
http://lucene.apache.org/java/do
I'm confused about what your "variants of search criterias" are. Could
you provide a few examples?
Also, if you can provide a higher-level statement of your problem, folks
can often come up with alternate approaches.
Best
Erick
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 9:20 AM, nukie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Hi Wojciech,
The code isn't ready, it is a major project and I am trying to also
complete the realtime indexing patches and look for a job. I believe
that the tag indexing stuff is of interest to many people so if there
is someone who can pay to get it completed feel free to contact me as
I am av
Hi there,
I will check that out but what do you suggest for searching??
without escaping works for query string "fw: fyi.dat" but i have to escape :
char for query string "fw:" so i am having two cases?
Please help me
Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> You can easily answer the questions about what W
I question whether your example actually searches what you
think. What I suggest is that you get a copy of Luke and
look at what your queries actually produce. That'll give you
a much better idea of what happens under the covers.
Also, query.toString() is your friend. Try printing out your
queries
Hi,
We're thinking of using Lucene to integrate search in a backup service
application. The background is that we have a bunch of users using a
backup service, and we want them to be able to search their own, and
only their own, backups.
The total amount of data that's being backed up is
The main arguments against using many separate indexes are
1> search warmup time. That is, each time you open an index
the first few queries take much longer than subsequent searches.
2> Managing a bazillion indexes is non-trivial.
That said, in your particular case these may not apply. I gu
Tobias,
That's the approach I took with Simpy.com and it's been working well for
several years now. You'll have to keep track of searchers and close them when
appropriate, of course.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Tobias
Are the terms stopwords?
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Cam Bazz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 1:33:48 AM
> Subject: Phrase Query
>
> Hello,
>
> Lets say I have
Hi,
I tested sample application with Luke as well.
I am using .NEt Version of Lucene (2.0.0.4) and i think i am getting error
due to that.
When i tested my queries with luke then its working fine and getting me
output as desired but then i used lucene API available for .NET then its
producing er
Um, ask over on the .NET user group?
Erick
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:20 PM, miztaken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I tested sample application with Luke as well.
> I am using .NEt Version of Lucene (2.0.0.4) and i think i am getting error
> due to that.
>
> When i tested my queries with
: Related topic: what if we need all the hits and not just the first 100?
Solr has a FAQ related to this that i think also applies here..
>How can I get ALL the matching documents back? ... How can I return an
>unlimited number of rows?
>
>This is impractical in most cases. People typically onl
: The query parser expects you to assign positionIncrement=0 for synonyms
: in this manner.
correct.
: The one kludge i see is that the QueryParser expects the total positions
: found to be greater than or equal to one. It might not be intentionally
: dealing with the total position count being
what is the behaviour of IndexReader.current() if i modify the index
manually? Will it returns false?
One more question
The index is on Linux
if my indexReader is open and some of the files in index are deleted, what
is the behaviour of this?
Will it give any exception like File Not found??
Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Or do we make a replacement for TopDocCollector which doesn't have
this : drawback, and uses an alternative for PriorityQueue which
allows its array to : grow?
I don't see that as being much better -- you still wouldn't want to
pass MAX_INT because waht if there really a
Hi All,
I'm running Ubuntu Linux 8.04, which has the sun jre installed in the system
area (/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun-1.6.0.06/jre/lib/).
I've manually installed an updated JRE (jre1.6.0_07) into /usr/local area
(/usr/local/lib/jre1.6.0_07/lib/), and my PATH environment variable is
updated to use th
27 matches
Mail list logo
