Hi there,
I was composing a Query like the Solr.DisMaxQueryHandler would do on my
own as I needed a different Tokenizing strategy for non whitespace
separated languages and more. The concept I took from
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2010/05/23/whats-a-dismax/
Assume now the following:
On 26.11.2010 14:39, ext Jan Kurella wrote:
Hi there,
I was composing a Query like the Solr.DisMaxQueryHandler would do on
my own as I needed a different Tokenizing strategy for non whitespace
separated languages and more. The concept I took from
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2010/05/2
On 26.11.2010 14:50, ext Jan Kurella wrote:
On 26.11.2010 14:39, ext Jan Kurella wrote:
Hi there,
I was composing a Query like the Solr.DisMaxQueryHandler would do on
my own as I needed a different Tokenizing strategy for non whitespace
separated languages and more. The concept I took from
h
So, you're using Solr, right? And have a custom analyzer? If that's the
case, Uwe pointed you in the right direction and I think everything may
be working fine, or at least as I'd expect.
Specifying stored="true" puts a verbatim, unanalyzed copy of the data
in the index. When you display a field i
Hi All
I was wondering whether I can use TermRangeQuery for my use case. I have a
collection of ids (represented as XDF-123) and I would like to do a search for
all the ids (might be in the range of 1) and for each matching id I want to
get the corresponding data that is stored in the inde
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> (Fuzzy scores on
> MultiSearcher and Solr are totally wrong because each shard uses another
> rewritten query).
Hmmm, really? I thought that fuzzy scoring should just rely on edit distance?
Oh wait, I think I see - it's because we can use
Absolutely, as long as your ids will sort as you expect.
I'm not clear what you mean by XDF-123 but if you've got
AAA-123
AAA-124
...
ABC-123
ABC-234
etc.
then you'll be fine. If they don't sort so neatly you can use the
TermRangeQuery constructor that takes a Collator but note the
performance
Hi Erik,
I see my problem, caused by a misunderstanding of the indexing by lucene.
I guess its due to the fact that FAST Data Search has real processing pipelines.
Youre right I use Solr but, as a matter of fact, in this special case
I really want to change the indexed _and_ stored data.
For secu
Hi
Basically test my ids look like:
AAA-231
AAD-234
ADD-123
Didn't now about the collator, i was going to do a custom sort based on the
number part of the id.
Thanks
Amin
On 26 Nov 2010, at 14:39, Ian Lea wrote:
> Absolutely, as long as your ids will sort as you expect.
>
> I'm not clear w
Can you "define the problem away"? That is, why do you want to store it at
all?
If there's no value to the users in seeing the encoded value, just don't
store it.
You can still search on the encoded value if in that case
Which is a way of saying that I don't know, off the top of my head, how
y
Hi
Unfortunately my range query approach did not work. It seems to be related to
the ids themselves. The list has ids that look this:
ID-NYC-1234
ID-LND-1234
TX-NYC-1334
TX-NYC-BBC-123
The ids may range from 90 to 1000. Is there another approach I could take? I
tried building a string wi
This is the problem for Fuzzy: each searcher expands the fuzzy query to a
different Boolean Query and so the scores are not comparable - MultiSearcher
(but not Solr) tries to combine the resulting rewritten queries into one
query, so every searcher has the same query.
And here starts the second bu
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> This is the problem for Fuzzy: each searcher expands the fuzzy query to a
> different Boolean Query and so the scores are not comparable - MultiSearcher
> (but not Solr) tries to combine the resulting rewritten queries into one
> query, so e
What sort of ranges are you trying to use? Maybe you could store a
separate field, just for these queries, with some normalized form of
the ids, with all numbers padded out to the same length etc.
--
Ian.
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
> Hi
>
> Unfortunately my ra
Essentially I'd like to construct a query which is almost like SQL in clause.
The lucene document contains the id and a string value. I'd like to get the
string value based on the id key. The ids may range within 1000. Is this
possible to do?
Thanks
Amin
Sent from my iPhone
On 26 Nov 2010,
Hi Erik,
the "problem" can be described as follows:
- we have a database for users
- users can search and mark/store records for watching
- the record marker is the unique path to the source and also the unique record
id of the database
- therefore we decided to sha256 the id as backreference fro
16 matches
Mail list logo
