The changes made by a IndexWriter since the last commit() will be undone
if you close it with IndexWriter#rollback().
Afaik using IndexReader#undeleteAll to undo previously done deletes is a
very bad way as it will not only undelete the documents deleted by the
current IndexReader but all dele
hii am mary and i have a problem with lucene, Actually a work with lucene
4.0.0, my problem is, how can I more listed all the terms, the display position
for each term in each document and their frequency?please help
Use TermsEnum to iterate through all terms, and DocsAndPositionsEnum
to visit all docs containing each term, and its frequency and all
positions of each term occurrence within the document.
Also, try to upgrade from 4.0.0 to the latest (4.3.0) ...
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
Hi Mary,
I've been out of the loop with Lucene and java for a bit so this is might
not be too correct, but here is an example of how it might be accomplished
(also you can see it in this gist: https://gist.github.com/rainkinz/5645139).
The output looks like this:
** Also note I'm using Lucene 4.3
I'll try to see how inculre with my code, thank you very much.
I have a problem with AtomicReader reader =
indexReader.leaves().get(0).reader(); it is topical in Lucene 4.0.0??
> Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 13:41:05 -0400
> Subject: Re: lucene 4.0.0
> From: brendan.grain...@gmail.com
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
>
> Hi Mary,
>
> I've been out of the loo
According to:
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_0_0/core/org/apache/lucene/index/IndexReader.html#leaves()it
is.
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 6:49 PM, mary meriem wrote:
>
>
> I have a problem with AtomicReader reader =
> indexReader.leaves().get(0).reader(); it is topical in Lucene 4.0.0??
>
> > Dat
Hi everyone,
I am building an autocomplete index. The index contains both the names and a
small set of fixed types.
The intention is that type matches will always come first, followed by name
matches.
I am using a PrefixQuery to do substring matching. Confusingly, I am finding
that very shor
yes thank you
> Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 18:59:13 -0400
> Subject: Re: lucene 4.0.0
> From: brendan.grain...@gmail.com
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
>
> According to:
> http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_0_0/core/org/apache/lucene/index/IndexReader.html#leaves()it
> is.
>
>
> On Fri, May 24, 201
