Thanks Ahmet:
I¹ve seen these, but I don¹t find any mechanism here helping to get me
from the query object to the xml or a DOM object. -scott
On 3/18/16, 11:35 AM, "Ahmet Arslan" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I think, xml query parser examples [1] are the safest way to persist
>Lucene queries.
>
>
>[1]https:
Hi Rob,
Thank you for explaining your approach. Still I have a few questions. Do I
need to store the values being aggregated as STORED at indexing time? and
how does the collector handle a large number of documents when aggregating?
I mean lets say I have several millions documents in an index and
Thanks James:
This looks promising. I¹ll repost when I¹ve had a chance to implement
this. -scott
On 3/18/16, 10:44 AM, "McKinley, James T"
wrote:
>We use Kryo to pass query objects between hosts:
>
>https://github.com/EsotericSoftware/kryo
>
>We initially had some trouble with it creating dy
Hi Gimantha,
You don't need to store the aggregates and don't need to retrieve
Documents. The aggregates are calculated during collection using the
BinaryDocValues from the facet-module. What I do, is that I need to store
values in the facets using AssociationFacetFields. (for example
FloatAssocia