I don't think there's an easy built-in way for Lucene to do this.
What you can do is implement a HitCollector to process each doc hit
and maintain a count for each user_group. You'll need to preload a
doc_id - user_group mapping. (Take a look at the code for
FieldCacheImpl.getInts() for sample
: Thanks much for that clarification, it helps a lot. The original request was
: to find docs wthat were NOT NULL, so I'm glad I'm not the only one who
: But with your RangeFilter comment, that seems unnecessary. You can use a
: RangeFilter with null, null as bounds, then just flip the bits in
As Luke was release with a Lucene-1.9
Where did you get this information? From all I know Luke is based on Lucene
Version 1.4.3.
On 7/19/06, Nicolas Lalevée [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le Mercredi 19 Juillet 2006 12:32, lude a écrit:
Hi Nicolas,
thanks for answering.
You wrote:
And
Daniel Noll wrote:
marbux wrote:
Hello,
The OpenDocument Fellowship attempts to maintain a directory of
applicatiopns supporting OpenDocument file formats.
http://www.opendocumentfellowship.org/applicationsa. I have been
attempting, without success, to determine whether Lucene supports
I'm using Luke to manage Lucene 1.9's index
On 7/20/06, lude [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As Luke was release with a Lucene-1.9
Where did you get this information? From all I know Luke is based on
Lucene
Version 1.4.3.
On 7/19/06, Nicolas Lalevée [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le Mercredi 19
lude wrote:
As Luke was release with a Lucene-1.9
Where did you get this information? From all I know Luke is based on
Lucene
Version 1.4.3.
The latest version of Luke was released with an early snapshot of 1.9. I
plan to release a 2.0-based version in a few days.
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
lude wrote:
As Luke was release with a Lucene-1.9
Where did you get this information? From all I know Luke is based on
Lucene
Version 1.4.3.
The latest version of Luke was released with an early snapshot of 1.9.
I plan to release a 2.0-based version in a
Hi,
I'm using MoreLikeThis class to find similar documents... but I'm not
sure if it is correct to pass as argument a Pdf file to
*MoreLikeThis.like()* method.
Trying to be more clear:
1) In my Lucene index I add some PDF files (I use PDFBox to extract text
and add fields to index)
2) Now I want
Do I have to extract text from PDF file and then pass an InputStream with the
text inside?
Yes.
Although technically you could pass the content unparsed it will contain a lot
of unintelligible garbage in the form of markup and images.
All Lucene classes deliberately try and avoid the mucky
What? You actually want me to put forth some effort? That's crazy talk G..
Thanks, I think I've got it now.
Best
Erick
Sorry for the delayed response. It takes me a while to get my head around
Lucene.
I've got parallel indexes, which means that chorological ordering by doc ID
would need to be a bit more sophisticated. It strikes me that there must be
some performance advantage doing it though.
I'll see if I can
This is how we solve the range query problem using filters. The nice
part about it is you can use a range in a query so several ranges can be
ORed/ANDed or NOTed together if required, instead of applying a range
filter to the who query. (Assumes dates in MMDD format)
Hope this helps Mike.
Wow. Looking at the implementation of
http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/api/org/apache/lucene/index/IndexReader.h
tml#open(org.apache.lucene.store.Directory) I've now realised that when you
create an IndexReader (clue it is abstract), you actually instantiate a
MultiReader, with an IndexReader
I was reading a book on SQL query tuning. The gist of it was that the
way to get the best performance (fastest execution) out of a SQL select
statement was to create execution plans where the most selective term
in the where clause is used first, the next most selective term is
used next, etc.
Hello
I suppose that you are using gmail?
It is just a property of gmail, take a look at thee archives after a
few hours, you will find it back ;-)
for example:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-java-user/
hth
--paul
On 7/19/06, Pasquale Imbemba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does it matter what order I add the sub-queries to the BooleanQuery Q.
That is, is the execution speed for the search faster (slower) if I do:
Q.add(Q1, BooleanClause.Occur.MUST);
Q.add(Q2, BooleanClause.Occur.MUST);
Q.add(Q3, BooleanClause.Occur.MUST);
As
Hello,
I'm trying to understand Lucene's slop value a little better, as
what I'm able to Google about it seems a little ambiguous.
My main goal is to search for a linear sequence of keywords in a
specific order over a given range. For instant I'd like a query of
fate ships to find
Have you looked at SpanNearQuery? From what you describe, it looks to be
what you want. The constructor takes slop as well as a boolean whether order
is relevant. The array of SpanQuerys would probably consist of a bunch of
SpanTermQuerys.
Best
Erick
18 matches
Mail list logo
