Hi Manivannan,
> thanks for the reply.
> Im not using any custom class loaders, I tried using the 4.2.1, i got the same
> issue, facet42 is found, but not lucene42.
> i have the facet.jar in my final jar.
> > location="../libs/luceneV4.2/lucene-codecs-4.2.0.jar"/>*
> > **
> > *
thanks for the reply.
Im not using any custom class loaders, I tried using the 4.2.1, i got the
same issue, facet42 is found, but not lucene42.
i have the facet.jar in my final jar.
location="../libs/luceneV4.2/lucene-codecs-4.2.0.jar"/>*
> **
> ***
One more information.
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Sharon Tam wrote:
> I tried following following this payloads tutorial to attach the term
> frequencies as payloads:
> http://searchhub.org/2009/08/05/getting-started-with-payloads/
>
> But I'm confused as to where I need to override the term frequency counter
well, I found out the issue - it is because the maxDocCharsToAnalyze is 0 in
the weightedSpanTermsExtractor by default. Works fine if I change there or
use the QueryScorer which has a default limit of 51200.
Thanks.
-
--
Phani
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble
Adrien and Rober, thanks a lot for the hints. Will try a few options and
see how it goes.
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
>
> > The default codec stores numeric doc values by blocks of 4096 values
> > that have independent
To answer my own question here, I switched from the default NativeFSLockFactory
to the SimpleFSLockFactory. This allows me to detect when the IndexWriter was
not properly closed since an attempt to open a new one will throw a
LockObtainFailedException, which I can key on to know to rebuild the
Hello Nicola,
I think it would be good if you start a new thread to discuss this problem,
as I don't think it's related to the issue in this thread.
Also, I did not understand what's the problem you're running into. What
used to work before 4.2 and doesn't work now?
Shai
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> The default codec stores numeric doc values by blocks of 4096 values
> that have independent numbers of bits per values. If you end up having
> most of these blocks empty, doc values will require little space but
> in a worst-case scenario whe
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Wei Wang wrote:
> Thanks for the hint. Could you point to some Codec that might do this for
> some types, even just as an side effect as you mentioned? It will be
> helpful to have something to start with.
>
Have a look at diskdv/ codec in the codecs/ module. Its
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Wei Wang wrote:
> DocValues makes fast per doc value lookup possible, which is nice. But it
> brings other interesting issues.
>
> Assume there are 100M docs and 200 NumericDocValuesFields, this ends up
> with huge number of disk and memory usage, even if there
Thanks for the hint. Could you point to some Codec that might do this for
some types, even just as an side effect as you mentioned? It will be
helpful to have something to start with.
And could you elaborate a bit more for "the facet on tons of sparse
fields"? I just got a vague idea from the comm
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Wei Wang wrote:
> DocValues makes fast per doc value lookup possible, which is nice. But it
> brings other interesting issues.
>
> Assume there are 100M docs and 200 NumericDocValuesFields, this ends up
> with huge number of disk and memory usage, even if there are
Hi,
I'm trying to use Lucene 4.2, but this merge of more taxonomy indexes
seam is no more working.
Do you have any idea why it has not to work in Lucene 4.2?
Normal faceted search on a single index is working correctly.
Nicola.
On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 16:53 +, Nicola Buso wrote:
> Hi Shai,
>
DocValues makes fast per doc value lookup possible, which is nice. But it
brings other interesting issues.
Assume there are 100M docs and 200 NumericDocValuesFields, this ends up
with huge number of disk and memory usage, even if there are just thousands
of values for each field. I guess this is b
Hi,
Precision step=1 is not necessarily the fastest (see javadocs of Lucene, should
be similar in Lucene.NET). Try the default, 4, first. In general, those range
queries will always be slower than text-only queries, as there is much more
work to do (more terms, more documents,...)
This questio
Hello,
I have a Lucene.NET index created with version 2.9.4.1. The size of the
index is about 25 Million entries (In the production environment I will have
50 Million or more). The Index size is 5.75GB. The index is used for
searching by text. I need to add a new functionality that allows performi
There may be 2 problems, to fix:
a) use 4.2.1 (if you are using custom class loaders in your application)
b) The stack trace says, that it can only find the codec "Facet42". This codec
is only in lucene-facet.jar, but this JAR file is not in your classpath. So you
seem to have some classpath prob
i don't get what u mean by setup. im not using solr. Could u please be more
specific.
we dont use maven for building the jar. Its just few build.xmls. It is just
plain Lucene 4.2.
I have to create an index using some tokenizers and filters.
with thanks,
Manivannan
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:07 PM,
As mentioned in the original answer, what is the setup you are using?
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Manivannan Selvadurai [mailto:manivan...@unmetric.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 201
I dint understand what u mean by directly inside ant or just for compiling,
but this is the process we do
Im using the Lucene jars in a build.xml and we use ant to build the jar and
i invoke the program on that resulting jar.
So will using lucene 4.2.1 fix the issue for me?
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013
This may be fixed in 4.2.1, but this depends on your setup. Are you using
Lucene directly inside ANT or is it just for compiling code?
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Manivannan Sel
Hi All,
I'm facing this problem.
When i build a jar out of my project and try to run the program that
invokes lucene part of the code, it gives me this exception
Exception in thread "main" java.util.ServiceConfigurationError: Cannot
instantiate SPI class: org.apache.lucene.codecs.
22 matches
Mail list logo
