I don't understand why I'm getting the results I'm getting.
If I search for "pandock*" I get 6 results
Np-pandock
Np-pandock-L
Np-pandock-1
Np-pandock-2
Np-pandock
Np-pandock-L1
If I search for np-pandock I get
Np-pandock
Np-pandock-L
If I search for pandock I get
Np-pandock
tually in there (which may surprise you depending upon
what analyzers you are using). You can also see how queries
parse using various analyzers. Which may also surprise you.
Best
Erick
On 5/8/07, John Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't understand why I'm getting
Yes, it doesn't work. it gives an error modal dialog box that says
"IMPL".
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Naber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 4:45 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: search problem/odd results
On Tuesday 08 May 2
)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(Unknown Source)
IMPL
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Naber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 3:27 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: search problem/odd results
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 16:17, John Powers wrote
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 4:22 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: search problem/odd results
John Powers wrote:
> java.lang.NoSuchFieldException: IMPL
> at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredField(Unknown Source)
That's a strange one ... Which
In a j2ee webapp we have a search object that stores a user's search
preferences (items/page, detail level, etc). it has a search() that
calls a static method getSearcher() that returns a static IndexSearcher
that all these user search objects use.searching with that gives us
a Hits object tha
uld
change it in the sources, recompile, redeploy, and see if that helps
you.
Otis
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/ - Tag - Search - Share
- Original Message ----
From: John Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-user@lucene.ap
a bad habit and look into HitCollector.
- Mark
John Powers wrote:
> Thanks for the response. Its definitely the user search object's
> search(). I have to iterate through all the hits that come back to
get
> all the categories used in the results, so the number that hits gets
>
Thanks to the "hitcollector" suggestion. It worked very well!we
have such a small index, but the categories are complicated, sequenced
and can be related in various ways that their structure is very
important to the users.so now I can get a list of "used categories"
with a hitcollector ins
Hello
I've asked before on this issue, and I think I have more information
now.
I have in a lucene 1.4 index, some Field.Text fields stored.I've
been focusing on the one called "name"
In luke 0.7 , run on the command line from a jar, if I do a search for
Name:"np-pandock*" I ge
Hello, I have done a search for this issue, but I didnt really see an
answer.
if i want to store things in a hierarchy, but i want items to be in multiple
categories at any level. i'd like to be able to search for an item and
only show it once, but maybe (not required) show what categories the
". Thinking of it
> in terms of SQL constructs makes it more difficult than it needs to be.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
>
>
> On 11/15/05, John Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello, I have done a search for this issue, but I didnt really see an
>
If I sort on a field called sequence, but at document creation time I add in
//create doc A
doc.add(Field.Text("sequence", "32"));
doc.add(Field.Text("sequence", "3"));
doc.add(Field.Text("sequence", "932"));
//create doc B
doc.add(Field.Text("sequence", "1"));
doc.add(Field.Text("sequence", "300
If I add keywords to a document at the same time, will they stay in that
order?
Create New doc A
doc.add(Field.Text("category", "toys"));
doc.add(Field.Text("sequence", "235"));
doc.add(Field.Text("category", "bears"));
doc.add(Field.Text("sequence", "63"));
doc.add(Field.Text("category", "truc
You have a case study using lucene? I would be interested in look at it if
you don't mind. I am putting lucene into an application for my company
currently.
Thank You.
--jN
On 11/22/05 10:18 AM, "Supreet Sethi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Its sort of case study. Including successes and fail
session.getServletContext().getRealPath("/") + "data/lucene"
On 11/22/05 12:49 PM, "krg9263" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am very new to Lucene.
> Does anyone have an example of a Lucene IndexWriter whose path is relative
> to a context path? All of the examples I have seen place it outside
The short answer is there is a great "highlighter" example in the Lucene In
Action book. It sounds like you may just want to use that really. What
with the snippets and html.
On 11/23/05 1:30 PM, "Alan Chandler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am a brand new newbie with respect to Lucene, and
Hello,
Lucene only lets you use a wildcard after a term, not before, correct?
What work arounds are there for that?
If I have an item 108585-123
And another 332323-123
How can I look for all the -123 family of items?
John Powers
Instead of just putting the keys in the index, can you put all the data you
might be getting out to display to the user, or whatever the final thing is?
That's what we do.Search on the id as you are, and then the hit has
documents that are loaded with all your final information instead of just
Am I correct in assuming that I can use lucene by itself as a search engine
in a website? If each user session is looking at the fsdirectory and
searching on it, is that ok? Or do I need to put in a queue or pool that
handles searching it; only allowing the one thing application-wide to
actuall
I would like to be able to search for 19 inches with the quote. So I get a
query like this:
Line 1: +( (name:19"*^4 ld:19"*^2 sd:19"*^3 kw:19"*^1) )
That won't work, so I wanted to escape the quotes.The docs said to use a
backslash. So I'm doing this:
luceneQuery.toString().replaceAll("\"
change the analyzer or take the quote out of the query?
Correct?
On 12/20/05 12:07 PM, "Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/20/05, John Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I would like to be able to search for 19 inches with the quote. So I get a
>&g
exSearcher instance. No problems with multiple searches on the same
IndexSearcher.
You can index while searching, as soon as you want the new entries to be
found by the IndexSearcher, just get a new instance of IndexSearcher
Aviran
http://www.aviransplace.com
-Original Message-----
From: John Powe
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 3:09 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Basic lucene usage
-Original Message-----
From: John Powers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 3:40 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Basic lucene
Hello,
What does everyone think about adding a subList(int, int) method to the Hits
class? In all the lucene implementations I usually end up needing a small
section for pagination of the results. So I go from X to Y and put them in
a List and return the List of Documents. Since I seem to al
Ya, you'll want to close and open your open searcher.
I have the indexer create random directories to work in. then when the
indexing is done it assigns the searcher a new location and fires off
the "close/open" command to the searcher.
-Original Message-
From: Amol Bhutada [mailto:[E
But its best to only have one reader/searcher, correct?
-Original Message-
From: Ramana Jelda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 9:08 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: searching and indexing simultaneously...
Hi,
You are right. There can be multipl
Hia
Is there any repository of best practices? Does LIA represent that?
I was thinking about a blog or something that everyone could post their
solutions into.I've written only 4 implementations of lucene, but
each was so very different, I was thinking it might be nice to know what
everyone el
e I said, if this is wiki is it, perfect!Maybe it is what I
was thinking of.
-Original Message-
From: Pasha Bizhan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 11:38 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: best practices
Hi,
> -----Original Message-
&
Would you say as a best practice that you can use both?When would
you and when wouldn't you? I trust databases more then free files, so I
am putting my more sensitive and volatile data in the database. If you
built a commenting system.. like a blog or an flickr type app, would
just a lucene
Are these super large files supposed to be searchable?
Can the binary files be stored somewhere else and just pointed to?
Can the text files be broken up?
-Original Message-
From: George Washington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 10:52 PM
To: java-user@lucene.a
Hello,
I have a couple instances of lucene. I just altered on implementation and now
its not keeping a segments file. while indexing occurs, there is a segment
file.but once its done, there isn't.all the other indexes have one.
the problem comes when i try to update a document, it
The lucene info is:
Manifest-Version: 1.0
Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.6.1
Created-By: Apache Jakarta
Name: org/apache/lucene
Specification-Title: Lucene Search Engine
Specification-Version: 1.4.3
Specification-Vendor: Lucene
Implementation-Title: org.apache.lucene
Implementation-Version: build 2004-
this code works in a couple other boxes as is.that deleting code removes
the active index after this one builds in a different location. then the
searcher is told to make this newest one the current and the old one is
deleted. it effects directories and their entire contents. it would
i feel confident in the delete sequence. i will run the things you ask for
though.this does work on my laptop.
the code that changed was some update method that was used in the first
release. so before the only writes needed were done by this and it wholesale
replaces. whereas the n
this problem.so, live and learn!
-----Original Message-
From: John Powers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat 1/28/2006 9:13 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: problem updating a document: no segments file?
i feel confident in the delete sequence. i will run the things you ask f
This may be a tangent, but for my filters and searches, I construct the
query with "+" and "-" and what not.. is this not the right way to do
this?I haven't had to extend or write any special AND or OR classes,
I just write the query and search the once. Any advantage to writing
Filter su
Hello,
Before I learned about filters in lucene I was building my initial query
as a stringbuffer and then I use that with a queryparser.Is there
any difference/advantage to separating out the "filter" part of my query
into a proper filter in lucene or does it just add requirements the same
to
I'm sure you've taken care of this, but I am curious myself:
If the 301 document only has a single term "batteries" (and thus is so
far low on the Hits), but has a price of seven cents, then the sort of
all the documents with "batteries" would put this near the top, but by
eliminating all document
any cameras in the search
results, but at the same time we dont mind if a few cameras do not
appear in those results if we can really fine tune our search results to
only show cameras and not camera casings and camera batteries etc.
I have been looking at QueryFilter and the Sort API, but haven
ache
Otis
- Original Message ----
From: John Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tue 21 Feb 2006 10:31:49 AM EST
Subject: fitler vs query
Hello,
Before I learned about filters in lucene I was building my initial query
as a stringbuffer and then I
sings and camera batteries etc.
>
> I have been looking at QueryFilter and the Sort API, but havent yet
> figured out a way to do what I am trying to do .. any pointers are
> greatly appreciated.
>
> -Thanks,
>
> John Powers wrote:
>
>> I'm sure you've taken ca
This doesn't really address your question, but...
Once you have the single indexsearcher, do you need any others? Could
your app just use the single instance?
-Original Message-
From: Gus Kormeier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 11:28 AM
To: java-user@luc
-Gus
-Original Message-----
From: John Powers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 9:35 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: IndexSearcher
This doesn't really address your question, but...
Once you have the single indexsearcher, do you need any others?
I don't know if this matters, but we do all of our geolocating in sql
with decent speed. All the trig is in the query itself and then we can
limit top 5, top 10 etc for what we show.Is the data such that you
need lucene?Can I ask what causes it to be beyond a databases
ability?
-Orig
How does the information change in each of these customer's documents?
I would think if they were very dynamic then updates to the single index
would not be great for you. But if the updates were just now and then,
then given the performance of lucene that the single index would be just
fine.
Hello,
If I have a user search for "b-trunk" I would like them to be able to
find "b-trunk" (with hypen). I would also like someone searching for
"b trunk" to also find "b-trunk".
On the other side, if someone searches for 12412 I would like them to be
able to find 12412-235, 12412-12
ot; and
searched. U will find the result..
Similarly for 12412-235, 12412-121, 12412-etc , indexed as
12412,12412235,235 etc
So obviously it will find 12412 search term.
Good luck,
Jelda
> -Original Message-
> From: John Powers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, Apri
If I search on id:test bbb in luke I find some items.
If I do a
ir.delete(new Term(IDENTITY, id))
I get records changed is zero..and those records aren't deleted
I do a print of new Term(IDENTITY, id) and it comes out with id:test bbb
What am I missing?
49 matches
Mail list logo
