Steven Parkes wrote:
There are no plans to do this. It's essentially impossible, given (1)
the reverse nature of text indexes and (2) Lucene's write-once segment
architecture.
What if the field is stored and unindexed? It should be possible to
update the contents of that in isolation. How wo
On 2/27/07, Steven Parkes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is true that you can store more data and that will make it possible
to get it back. Storing fields (w/ or w/o indexing) allows you to pull
them back. Storing term vectors gives you something in-between nothing
and everything.
I will look i
Collex is quite open source, its just ugly source :) We're the
'patacriticism' project at SourceForge, under the "collex" directory
in Subversion.
Collex implements tagging by implementing JOIN cross-references
between user/tag documents and regular object documents. It's
scalability is not goi
