Where do you get your Lucene/Solr downloads from?
[] ASF Mirrors (linked in our release announcements or via the Lucene website)
[X] Maven repository (whether you use Maven, Ant+Ivy, Buildr, etc.)
[X] I/we build them from source via an SVN/Git checkout.
[] Other (someone in your company mirrors
Solr's faceting would be the answer .. in solr.
Maybe you could find hints about doing that with lucene by having a look at
solr's code for faceting.
Pierre
-Message d'origine-
De : Emmad [mailto:emmad_f...@yahoo.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 26 janvier 2011 10:53
À : java-user@lucene.apache
Hi Livia,
One way of doing this line slope would be to implement a custom tokenizer that
could tokenize on new line, and split each token into the words it contains.
I.e. Each word of a line would be seen as being at the same position (and
having same offset and length as the complete line).
slop
Hi Pierre,
many thanks for your idear.
I had a look to Payloads ... should it possible to store the line number as
payload?
Best Regards,
Livia
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: "Pierre GOSSE"
Gesendet: 08.02.2011 09:37:53
An: "java-user@lucene.apache.org"
Betref
500 is the max size of text fragments to be returned by highlight. It shouldn't
be the problem here, as far as I understand highlight.
Gong li, how is defined the field "contents" ? Is it the only field on which
the search is made ?
Pierre
-Message d'origine-
De : Ian Lea [mailto:ian..
another issue (apparently unrelated, but who knows ?) See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2874
Pierre
De : Cescy [mailto:ee07b...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 18 mars 2011 07:32
À : java-user; Pierre GOSSE
Objet : Re:RE: About highlighter
Yes, I only search the "contents"
Hi,
Maybe is it related to :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3087
Pierre
-Message d'origine-
De : Joel Halbert [mailto:j...@su3analytics.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 27 mai 2011 12:57
À : lucene users
Objet : FastVectorHighlighter.getBestFragments returning null
Hi,
I'm using L
d correctly this bug definitely
applies to fields with TermVector.WITH_OFFSETS.
My field uses TermVector.WITH_POSITIONS_OFFSETS)
I wasn't sure from the bug report if it applies to
WITH_POSITIONS_OFFSETS as well? It looks like it might?
- Joel
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 13:56 +0200, Pierre GOSSE wrote
