Hello,
We have very old indexes (i.e. created with Lucene 2.1.0) we would like to run
the CheckIndex tool from the 2.9.4 Lucene jar file, since it is not available
in 2.1.0. Is it safe to assume that if we are not running with the -fix option
that the indexes being checked aren't altered but the
Hello,
We have code running with Lucene 2.9.4 that does the following:
1. Check that number of documents to be deleted, found with a particular
query, matches the expected number we pass in
2. For each ScoreDoc in the ScoreDoc[] returned from the search we call
deleteDocument(score
What about undeleteAll? Is there an equivalent on the IndexWriter side?
-Original Message-
From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 4:01 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene 3.6.2 deleteDocument(docNum) and undeleteAll
Use delete by que
Hello,
In Lucene 4.x is there a way to get the number of documents that were deleted
from calling IndexWriter. deleteDocuments(Query)?
Another question, if we call IndexWriter. tryDeleteDocument(Reader, docId)
utilizing a near-real-time reader, what is the appropriate order to close the
reader
Hello,
In earlier versions of Lucene the TermRangeQuery constructor was able to take a
Collator object in order to provide a custom comparator for comparing terms
when determining whether or not a document's term fell within the search range.
In Lucene 4.x this functionality has been removed, so
Hello,
Is there any point during a merge operation where the index cannot be
searched or is unstable? We want to create a bunch of smaller indexes in
parallel and then merge them into a single index that may have searches
running against it.
Thanks,
Ian Koelliker
Would it matter if an IndexReader was opened while an index merge is in
progress?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 12:03 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Index merge question
When you open an In
Hello,
We are using phrase queries with a slop value to perform Near and Within style
searches and the issue we are encountering is as follows:
Since the slop value in the PhraseQuery is the edit-distance, a message with
the terms 'thank' and 'you' will be found with a query of field:"thank you
Hello,
In our indexes we have a field that is a combination of other various metadata
fields (i.e. subject, from, to, etc.). Each field that is added has a null
position at the beginning. As an example, in Luke the field data looks like:
null_1 this is a test subject null_1 ikoelliker email
arious
> metadata fields (i.e. subject, from, to, etc.). Each field that is added has
> a null position at the beginning. As an example, in Luke the field data looks
> like:
>
> null_1 this is a test subject null_1 ikoelliker email address
>
> If someone searches this field using a NEA
10 matches
Mail list logo
