at 4:21 AM, Jon Stewart
j...@lightboxtechnologies.com wrote:
Hello,
I've done a lot of googling, but haven't stumbled upon the magic
answer: how does one use StandardQueryParser with numeric fields
representing timestamps, to allow for range queries?
When indexing, my timestamp fields are ISO
as an exercise for the
reader. Good luck!
--
Ian.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Jon Stewart
j...@lightboxtechnologies.com wrote:
Eek. So is there a parsing component somewhere that gets handed a
field name and query components (e.g., created, 2010-01-01,
2014-12-31), which I can derive
Hello,
I've done a lot of googling, but haven't stumbled upon the magic
answer: how does one use StandardQueryParser with numeric fields
representing timestamps, to allow for range queries?
When indexing, my timestamp fields are ISO 8601 strings. I'm parsing
them and then storing the
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
--
Jon Stewart, Principal
(646) 719-0317 | j...@lightboxtechnologies.com | Arlington, VA
-h...@lucene.apache.org
--
Jon Stewart, Principal
(646) 719-0317 | j...@lightboxtechnologies.com | Arlington, VA
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h
about last night is that it wouldn't seem to be
too hard to do the faceting for this case by using update-able
NumericDocValue on a dummy parent object, since that shouldn't require
re-indexing.
TIA,
Jon
--
Jon Stewart, Principal
(646) 719-0317 | j...@lightboxtechnologies.com | Arlington, VA
://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Jon Stewart
j...@lightboxtechnologies.com wrote:
Hello,
tl;dr: I'd like to know how to do faceting over the result set of a
query-time join (JoinUtils). If it's not currently supported by
Lucene, I'd appreciate some pointers about what needs to be done
:)
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Jon Stewart
j...@lightboxtechnologies.com wrote:
I upgraded to 4.5. Same results, unfortunately. Most docs in the
result set will have a Passage where numMatches() 0, but some do
not. In these cases, the Passage array's length is greater than zero.
Jon
.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
--
Jon Stewart, Principal
(646) 719-0317 | j...@lightboxtechnologies.com | Arlington, VA
in the array will have matches. I've seen this on a
simple one-word query, where the word clearly exists in the Document's
text for the field (and the Document is included in the TopDocs result
set).
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Jon
--
Jon Stewart, Principal
(646) 719-0317 | j...@lightboxtechnologies.com
the latest release? There are some bugs fixed...
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Jon Stewart
j...@lightboxtechnologies.com wrote:
Hello,
I've observed that when using PostingsHighlighter in Lucene 4.4 that
some of the responsive documents in TopDocs will have zero matches in
the associated array
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
--
Jon Stewart, Principal
(646) 719-0317 | j...@lightboxtechnologies.com | Arlington, VA
://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Jon Stewart
j...@lightboxtechnologies.com wrote:
Iterating over term matches is a recent need for me, too (experimenting
with ranking matches/passages independently, across documents). I'm using
the new PostingsHighlighter and giving
);
MyIndexWriter.add(doc);
}
Is it possible to do this? I don't mind jumping through some hoops.
Thanks!
Jon
--
Jon Stewart, Principal
(646) 719-0317 | j...@lightboxtechnologies.com | Arlington, VA
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user
there
won't be many segments. But from my reading of the migration guide
you shouldn't need to use the Composite reader.
Hope this helps - we are getting outside my area of expertise so don't
trust anything I say.
--
Ian.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Jon Stewart
j
, but why are you using SlowCompositeReaderWrapper rather than
just
IndexReader rdr = DirectoryReader.open(dir)? I get the same results either
way,
--
Ian.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Jon Stewart
j...@lightboxtechnologies.com wrote:
Hello,
I cannot extract document term vectors
IOException,
InterruptedException, CorruptIndexException {
final String path = args[0];
createIndex(path);
readIndex(path);
}
}
--
Jon Stewart, Principal
(646) 719-0317 | j...@lightboxtechnologies.com | Arlington, VA
doc.add(...) statements.
--
Ian.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Jon Stewart
j...@lightboxtechnologies.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
Which statistics in particular (which methods)?
I'd like to know the frequency of each term in each
;
}
System.out.println(doc + i + had + numTerms + terms);
}
else {
System.err.println(null term vector on doc + i);
}
}
On every doc, the Terms object I get back from getTermVector(i, body) is null.
Jon
--
Jon Stewart, Principal
(646) 719-0317 | j
19 matches
Mail list logo
