Hi,
we use Lucene to store around 300 millions of records. We use the index both
for conventional searching, but also for all the system's data - we replaced
MySQL with Lucene because it was simply not working at all with MySQL due to
the amount or records. Our problem is that we have HUGE
Hi
First you can use MatchAllDocsQuery, which matches all documents. It will
save a HUGE posting list (TAG:TAG), and performs much faster. For example
TAG:TAG computes a score for each doc, even though you don't need it.
MatchAllDocsQuery doesn't.
Second, move away from Hits ! :) Use Collectors
.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 4:56 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance problems with Lucene 2.9
Hi
First you
Hi !
Thanks so much !!
* I'll check the documentation for MatchAllDocsQuery.
* I'm already changing my code to create BooleanQueries instead of filters -
is that better than MatchAllDocsQuery or it's the same?
* Is using MatchAllDocsQuery the only way to disable scoring?
* Would you have any
Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 4:56 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance problems with Lucene 2.9
Hi
First you can use MatchAllDocsQuery, which matches all documents. It will
save a HUGE posting list (TAG:TAG), and performs much
Subject: Re: Performance problems with Lucene 2.9
What is the main difference between Hits and Collectors?
- Mike
aka...@gmail.com
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
And if you only have a filter and apply it to all documents, make
: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Michel Nadeau [mailto:aka...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 5:10 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance problems with Lucene 2.9
What is the main difference between Hits and Collectors?
- Mike
://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 4:56 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance problems with Lucene 2.9
Hi
First you can use MatchAllDocsQuery
problems with Lucene 2.9
Hi
First you can use MatchAllDocsQuery, which matches all documents. It
will
save a HUGE posting list (TAG:TAG), and performs much faster. For
example
TAG:TAG computes a score for each doc, even though you don't need it.
MatchAllDocsQuery doesn't
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 4:56 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance problems with Lucene 2.9
Hi
First you can
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance problems with Lucene 2.9
I'll definitely switch to a Collector.
It's just not clear for me if I should use BooleanQueries or
MatchAllDocuments+Filters ?
And should I write my own collector or the TopDocs one is perfect for me
-Original Message-
From: Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 4:56 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance problems with Lucene 2.9
Hi
First you can use MatchAllDocsQuery, which matches all
documents
, 2009 5:35 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance problems with Lucene 2.9
I'll definitely switch to a Collector.
It's just not clear for me if I should use BooleanQueries or
MatchAllDocuments+Filters ?
And should I write my own collector or the TopDocs
-Original Message-
From: Michel Nadeau [mailto:aka...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 5:35 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance problems with Lucene 2.9
I'll definitely switch to a Collector.
It's just not clear for me if I
-
From: Michel Nadeau [mailto:aka...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 5:35 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance problems with Lucene 2.9
I'll definitely switch to a Collector.
It's just not clear for me if I should use BooleanQueries
Message-
From: Michel Nadeau [mailto:aka...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 5:35 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance problems with Lucene 2.9
I'll definitely switch to a Collector.
It's just not clear for me if I should use
PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance problems with Lucene 2.9
The problem with this method is that I won't be able to know how many
total
results / pages a search have?
For example if I do a search X that returns 1,000,000 records, so 5,000
pages of 200 items, I
17 matches
Mail list logo
