On 10/18/2013 1:08 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
The codec intercepts merges in order to clean up files that are no longer
referenced
What happens if a document is deleted while there's a reader open on the
index, and the segments are merged? Maybe I misunderstand what you meant by
this statement, but
>
> The codec intercepts merges in order to clean up files that are no longer
> referenced
>
What happens if a document is deleted while there's a reader open on the
index, and the segments are merged? Maybe I misunderstand what you meant by
this statement, but if the external file is deleted, sin
On 10/13/13 8:09 PM, Michael Sokolov wrote:
On 10/13/2013 1:52 PM, Adrien Grand wrote:
Hi Michael,
I'm not aware enough of operating system internals to know what
exactly happens when a file is open but it sounds to be like having
separate files per document or field adds levels of indirection
On 10/13/2013 1:52 PM, Adrien Grand wrote:
Hi Michael,
I'm not aware enough of operating system internals to know what
exactly happens when a file is open but it sounds to be like having
separate files per document or field adds levels of indirection when
loading stored fields, so I would be sur
Hi Michael,
I'm not aware enough of operating system internals to know what
exactly happens when a file is open but it sounds to be like having
separate files per document or field adds levels of indirection when
loading stored fields, so I would be surprised it it actually proved
to be more effic
On 10/11/2013 03:19 PM, Michael Sokolov wrote:
On 10/11/2013 03:04 PM, Adrien Grand wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Michael Sokolov
wrote:
I've been running some tests comparing storing large fields
(documents, say
100K .. 10M) as files vs. storing them in Lucene as stored fields.
In
On 10/11/2013 03:04 PM, Adrien Grand wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Michael Sokolov
wrote:
I've been running some tests comparing storing large fields (documents, say
100K .. 10M) as files vs. storing them in Lucene as stored fields. Initial
results seem to indicate storing them exter
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Michael Sokolov
wrote:
> I've been running some tests comparing storing large fields (documents, say
> 100K .. 10M) as files vs. storing them in Lucene as stored fields. Initial
> results seem to indicate storing them externally is a win (at least for
> binary doc
I've been running some tests comparing storing large fields (documents,
say 100K .. 10M) as files vs. storing them in Lucene as stored fields.
Initial results seem to indicate storing them externally is a win (at
least for binary docs which don't compress, and presumably we can
compress the ex
