ng documents)."
(see
https://lucene.apache.org/core/6_0_1/core/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene60/package-summary.html
)
which, judging from the code and the above post, is wrong, and perhaps could be
corrected...? (Thanks in advance.)
Best regards,
Oliver
Dipl.-Phys. Oliver Kaleske
PTV GROUP
Hi,
> For example I was not able to find:
> 1) when the method FieldType.setIndexed(true) was dropped and how to
> change coding
5.0, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6013
> 2) Same for the method Query.extractTerms
5.2, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6425
hth,
]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. August 2016 11:09
An: Lucene Users <java-user@lucene.apache.org>; Oliver Kaleske
<oliver.kale...@ptvgroup.com>
Betreff: Re: Some segments in compound format, others not
Hi Oliver,
The default behavior of Lucene (well, TieredMergePolicy, the default m
: Steve Rowe [mailto:sar...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 30. September 2016 21:48
An: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Oliver Kaleske <oliver.kale...@ptvgroup.com>
Betreff: Re: null Query from MultiFieldQueryParser.getFieldQuery
Hi Oliver,
Thanks for reporting and for the analysis, this is
Try
BooleanQuery.Builder builder = new BooleanQuery.Builder();
builder.add(subQuery1, occur1);
builder.add(subQuery2, occur2);
// ...
BooleanQuery query = builder.build();
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: szzoli [mailto:reg9sz...@freemail.hu]
Hi,
in updating Lucene from 6.1.0 to 6.2.0 I came across the following:
We have a subclass of MultiFieldQueryParser (MFQP) for creating a custom type
of Query, which calls getFieldQuery() on its base class (MFQP).
For each of its search fields, this method has a Query created by calling
Hi,
I noticed on some of my Lucene indexes that they consist of both segments in
compound format and segments in non-compound format.
There appears to be a pattern such that smaller segments (in terms of disk
storage) are in compound format, and larger segments are non-compound.
However, in one
Hi,
try
BooleanQuery inner = new BooleanQuery.Builder().add(ownerQueryX,
Occur.SHOULD).add(groupQueryY, Occur.SHOULD).build();
BooleanQuery constrainedQuery = new BooleanQuery.Builder().add(inner,
Occur.MUST).add(query, Occur.MUST).build();
You can also split this into several