I upgrade lucene to 6.1.0, hope it works, thank you very much!
the mount( contain all data directories and index directories ) is shared
by four different computers, but each index directory can be accessed only
by one computer, we have four index directories.
2016-07-21 5:13 GMT+08:00 Michael Mc
later. these two computer mount the same directory of a macmini use nfs,
but their index directory is different. It seems nfs is the problem.
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Ziming Dong
wrote:
> I upgrade lucene to 6.1.0, hope it works, thank you very much!
>
> the mount( contain
r.java:28)
> at
> sewm.bdbox.search.ThreadedInfomallIndexer.(ThreadedInfomallIndexer.java:21)
> at
> sewm.bdbox.search.ThreadedInfomallIndexer$Builder.build(ThreadedInfomallIndexer.java:72)
> at
> sewm.bdbox.search.ThreadedInfomallIndexer.main(ThreadedInfomallIndexer.java:129)
>
it seems 1071082519 is a special number.
- -
Ziming Dong
*http://suiyuan2009.github.io/ <http://suiyuan2009.github.io/>*
> I'll see if I can make a standalone test case showing this.
> >
> > If you open those indices with an IndexReader instead, does it succeed?
> >
> > If you run CheckIndex, what does it report?
> >
> > Mike McCandless
> >
> > http://blog.mikem
M, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> Do you have 2 separate segments files in that 2nd index?
>
> Which exact Lucene version is this?
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Ziming D
pen, if your IO system honors
> fsync.
>
> What IO devices are used by the NFS server?
>
> NFS is not well tested and has several known problems with Lucene so
> this is already risky ground...
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> On Thu, Sep
your NFS client and
> then to the Mac Mini's NFS server failed to actually move all written
> bytes to durable storage.
>
> Can you reproduce this issue if you use a more well trodden IO system,
> e.g. Linux with ext4 on a local IO device?
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://b
sorry to resend.
I'll change IO to local. Is there anyway to recover first index? now it can
not be opened by checkIndex, we are building index of 7 billion webpages,
it costs much time to rebuild.
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Ziming Dong
wrote:
> I'll change IO to local. Is th
This is why Lucene is so careful about
> writing a new one to a "pending" file, fsync'ing that, fsyncing the
> directory, and doing an atomic rename, all before removing the older
> segment files.
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
&g
ad/ayl5q6rgtngeuoyy
>
> Just be careful! Make a backup copy of your index first!
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Ziming Dong
> wrote:
> > do you mean `http://www.getopt.org/luke/`?
> >
> >
10 matches
Mail list logo