On 08/28/2018 01:25 AM, Priya Lakshmi Muthuswamy wrote:
Hi,
Kindly review the fix for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8210047
webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pmuthuswamy/8210047/webrev.00/
Thanks,
Priya
Just because we don't use frames in the JDK API docs doesn't mean they
OK
On 08/29/2018 12:15 AM, Priya Lakshmi Muthuswamy wrote:
Hi Jon,
2. There's an inconsistency in the way that links are handled in some
places ... sometimes the same color is used for all pseudo-classes
for the element (:link, :visited, :hover, :active) and sometimes
different colors are use
OK
On 08/29/2018 07:40 AM, Hannes Wallnöfer wrote:
Sorry, I didn’t think it was necessary. Here it is:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8176453/webrev.03/
Hannes
Am 29.08.2018 um 16:27 schrieb Jonathan Gibbons :
Are you going to post a reduced webrev, without the Selenium files?
-- Jon
Justin,
It seems there are two forms of src.zip out in the wild. My previous
response was based on using a src.zip that is essentially just a zip of
the contents of appropriate OpenJDK repo. As such, it has top level
directories like "make", "src", "test", and the src/ directory does not
co
Justin,
To follow up on this some more, can you tell me where you are getting
"the java9 src.zip" that you refer to?
Or, if you can't recall, can you check the layout of the contents?
Is it like this:
openjdk/ADDITIONAL_LICENSE_INFO
openjdk/ASSEMBLY_EXCEPTION
openjdk/bin
openjdk/c
